$\textbf{Problem:}$ I have the following improper integral in polar coordinates:
$$E =\int\limits_0^{2\pi} \int\limits_a^\infty I \cdot r \cdot dr \cdot d\theta$$
Rewriting the inner improper integral $$E =\int\limits_0^{2\pi} \lim_{b\to\infty}\int\limits_a^b I \cdot r \cdot dr \cdot d\theta$$
$\textbf{Question: Is it then OK to interchange like this??}$ $$E =\lim_{b\to\infty} \int\limits_0^{2\pi} \int\limits_a^b I \cdot r \cdot dr \cdot d\theta$$
I ask because the latter converges to the result stated in my book, and the former blows up?...
I posted a similar question 5 months ago, but no one has answered it, so I decided to restate it a bit and try again :)
$\textbf{Background}$
I am trying to solve an integral I found in a book (Offshore Hydromechanics). This book states that one way to find the increase in kinetic energy of the potential flow around a cylinder $\textbf{(see attached pictures)}$ is by evaluating the following integral that subtracts the total initial energy from the total energy after the cylinder is inserted:
$$E =\iint\limits_{cylinder}^\infty \frac{1}{2}\cdot \rho \cdot [u(x,y,t)]^2 dx\cdot dy -\iint\limits_{cylinder}^\infty \frac{1}{2}\cdot \rho \cdot [u_\infty(t)]^2 dx\cdot dy $$
The book states it's source to be Hydrodynamics by Sir Horace Lamb. I found this book but was unable to locate this integral in the book after much searching. Then I decided to try and solve it myself. I figured it was easier to solve in polar coordinates. This led me to the following vector fields:
The undisturbed vectorfield:
$$V = u_\infty \textbf{i} + 0\textbf{j}$$
And for the disturbed vectorfield in polar coordinates (a is cylinder radius):
$$V = \left(u_\infty \left(1-\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)cos(\theta)\right)\textbf{v}_r + \left(- u_\infty\left(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)sin(\theta)\right)\textbf{v}_\theta $$
So the integral from above should be written (since u is the size of the velocity):
$$E =\int\limits_0^{2\pi} \int\limits_a^\infty \frac{1}{2}\cdot \rho \cdot \left[\sqrt{\left(u_\infty \left(1-\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)cos(\theta)\right)^2+\left(- u_\infty\left(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)sin(\theta)\right)^2}\right]^2 r \cdot dr\cdot d\theta \\ -\int\limits_0^{2\pi} \int\limits_a^\infty \frac{1}{2}\cdot \rho \cdot u_\infty^2 r \cdot dr\cdot d\theta $$
I then moved the integrands under the same integral signs since the limits of integration were the same
$$E =\int\limits_0^{2\pi} \int\limits_a^\infty \left(\frac{1}{2}\rho \left[\left(u_\infty \left(1-\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)cos(\theta)\right)^2+\left(- u_\infty\left(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right)sin(\theta)\right)^2- u_\infty^2\right] \right) r dr d\theta $$
The inner integral is improper. If I evaluate the inner integral from a to b, then take the limit as b goes to infinity the entire integral does not converge.
However if I evaluate the inner integral from a to b, then evaluate the outer integral, and then afterwards take the limit as b goes to infinity, the integral converges nicely to the following:
$$E = \frac{1}{2}\cdot u_\infty^2\cdot a^2 \cdot\rho \cdot \pi $$
Which is equal to the kinetic energy of a mass equal to the mass of displaced water moving with the free flow speed (if integrating in z-coordinate). This is the correct answer according to my book...
Now my question is if this is allowed?? I mean interchanging the limit of the inner improper integral with the outer integral? I didn't think it was, but it gives me the correct answer? That's what made me wonder :) Or are there other ways to solve the integral?