I am trying to work out how one obtains the adjoint representation of a Lie algebra from the adjoint representation of the Lie group. I apologise if this is a trivial question but I am a physicist so I am rusty.

Consider a Lie group $G$ and its corresponding Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. The adjoint representation of $G$ is given by

$$ \mathrm{Ad}: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}).$$

According to the Wiki article, I can obtain the adjoint representation $\mathrm{ad}$ of the Lie algebra from the pushforward of $\mathrm{Ad}$:

$$ \mathrm{ad} : = \mathrm{Ad}_* : \mathfrak{g} \rightarrow \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g}), $$

where $\mathrm{Der}(g)$ is the derivation algebra.

Now, from my knowledge of the pushforward, I would say that the pushforward maps vectors in one tangent space, to vectors in another. So I would expect $\mathrm{Ad}_*$ to act as

$$ \mathrm{Ad}_* : \mathfrak{g} \rightarrow T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})), $$

where $I$ is the identity of $\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})$. What I do not understand is why the elements of $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}))$ could be interpreted as operators on $\mathfrak{g}$. In other words, I do not understand why $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})) \cong \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$. From a differential geometry perspective, tangent vectors are objects which act on functions $f : M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, so where do we deduce that these tangent vectors of $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}))$ are in fact operators on $\mathfrak{g}$?

Theorem 2.3 of this states that $ A \in T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})) $ then for $Y \in \mathfrak{g}$ it acts as

$$ A(Y) = \frac{d}{dt} \mathrm{Ad}(\exp tX) Y \bigg|_{t=0}$$

where $A = \mathrm{ad}(X)$. I do not understand whether this is a definition or can be deduced purely from $\mathrm{ad}$, but I do not know why this is how $\mathrm{ad}$ should act. It also seems like an abuse of notation here too, should this not be acting on some test function $f$?


A canonical identification is being made between a vector space and one of its tangent spaces.

Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space, and $M_V=\text{End}(V)$ be the algebra of linear maps $V\to V$. $M_V$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space, so we have a canonical isomorphism $T_AM_V\cong M_V$ for each $A\in M_V$. $GL(V)$ and its Lie subgroups are submanifolds of $M_V$, so we may identify their Lie algebras with subspaces of $M_V$. Under this identification, the Lie bracket can be written in terms of multiplication in $M_V$ by $[A,B]=AB-BA$. This is why we can write the Lie algebras of linear algebraic groups ($\mathfrak{gl}(n)$, $\mathfrak{so}(n)$, etc.) as sets of matrices.

$\text{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})\subset GL(\mathfrak{g})$ is a linear algebraic group, so, as above, we may identify $T_I\text{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})$ with a subspace of $M_\mathfrak{g}$, the set of linear maps $\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}$. With a bit of computation, one can show that these linear maps are in fact derivations on $\mathfrak{g}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.