Deducing the adjoint representation of a Lie algebra from the adjoint representation of the Lie group I am trying to work out how one obtains the adjoint representation of a Lie algebra from the adjoint representation of the Lie group. I apologise if this is a trivial question but I am a physicist so I am rusty.
Consider a Lie group $G$ and its corresponding Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. The adjoint representation of $G$ is given by
$$ \mathrm{Ad}: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}).$$
According to the Wiki article, I can obtain the adjoint representation $\mathrm{ad}$ of the Lie algebra from the pushforward of $\mathrm{Ad}$:
$$ \mathrm{ad} : = \mathrm{Ad}_* : \mathfrak{g} \rightarrow \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g}), $$
where $\mathrm{Der}(g)$ is the derivation algebra.
Now, from my knowledge of the pushforward, I would say that the pushforward maps vectors in one tangent space, to vectors in another. So I would expect $\mathrm{Ad}_*$ to act as
$$ \mathrm{Ad}_* : \mathfrak{g} \rightarrow T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})), $$
where $I$ is the identity of $\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})$. What I do not understand is why the elements of $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}))$ could be interpreted as operators on $\mathfrak{g}$. In other words, I do not understand why $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})) \cong \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$. From a differential geometry perspective, tangent vectors are objects which act on functions $f : M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, so where do we deduce that these tangent vectors of $T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g}))$ are in fact operators on $\mathfrak{g}$?
Theorem 2.3 of this states that $ A \in T_I(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})) $ then for $Y \in \mathfrak{g}$ it acts as
$$ A(Y) = \frac{d}{dt} \mathrm{Ad}(\exp tX) Y \bigg|_{t=0}$$
where $A = \mathrm{ad}(X)$. I do not understand whether this is a definition or can be deduced purely from $\mathrm{ad}$, but I do not know why this is how $\mathrm{ad}$ should act. It also seems like an abuse of notation here too, should this not be acting on some test function $f$?
 A: A canonical identification is being made between a vector space and one of its tangent spaces.
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space, and $M_V=\text{End}(V)$ be the algebra of linear maps $V\to V$. $M_V$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space, so we have a canonical isomorphism $T_AM_V\cong M_V$ for each $A\in M_V$. $GL(V)$ and its Lie subgroups are submanifolds of $M_V$, so we may identify their Lie algebras with subspaces of $M_V$. Under this identification, the Lie bracket can be written in terms of multiplication in $M_V$ by $[A,B]=AB-BA$. This is why we can write the Lie algebras of linear algebraic groups ($\mathfrak{gl}(n)$, $\mathfrak{so}(n)$, etc.) as sets of matrices.
$\text{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})\subset GL(\mathfrak{g})$ is a linear algebraic group, so, as above, we may identify $T_I\text{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})$ with a subspace of $M_\mathfrak{g}$, the set of linear maps $\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}$. With a bit of computation, one can show that these linear maps are in fact derivations on $\mathfrak{g}$.
