I've been working on a problem where I ended up with the following non linear ODE:


where $A$ is just some constant.

I realize that for a specific sign of the function $x(t)$ the solution is a parabola but I need to know beforehand the sign of the function for a specific $t$... Is there a way to solve this equation?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm unsure of how to handle situations when $x(t) = 0$, but one approach is as follows: We can note that $\text{sign}(x(t)) = \frac{x(t)}{\sqrt{(x(t))^2}}$ (again, for non-zero $x(t)$). Thus, your differential equation becomes: $$\frac{d^2}{dt^2}x(t)= A \frac{x(t)}{\sqrt{(x(t))^2}}$$ Wolfram Alpha can solve this (with step-by-step solution), and it doesn't seem to difficult to follow. $\endgroup$ – apnorton Apr 26 '13 at 21:22

For now I will assume $A$ to be strictly positive. Let $x(t)$ be a solution on an interval $I$. On an interval where $x(t)$ is strictly positive, $x(t)$ is a parabol pointing up. On an interval where $x(t)$ is strictly negative, $x(t)$ is a parabol pointing down. On an interval where $x(t)$ is zero, well... $x(t)$ is zero. (you seem to have already proved this)

If $x(t)$ never reaches 0, then $x(t)$ is constant-sign, because it is continuous (it has to be because it must be two times differentiable). So $x(t)$ is a parabol and resolution is over.

If $x(t)$ reaches zero, let $K$ be the subset of $I$ where $x(t)=0$. K is a closed subset of $I$ so it's the intersection of $I$ and a reunion of closed intervals and singletons. Let $[b,c]$ be one of them (we can have $b=c$).

Suppose that we have room in $I$ at the left of $b$. Then we have a small iterval $]a,b[$ where $x(t) \neq 0$. On that interval $x(t)$ is a parabol. But then $x(t)$ can't be differentiated two times at $b$ unless $x(t)$ is $0$ on $]a,b[$, which is absurd.

Same goes at the right of $c$. We have proved that if $x(t)$ is zero somewhere, $x(t)$ is zero everywhere.

So the solutions are : positive upward parabol, negative downward parabol, and zero. All these solutions are maximal when $I=\mathbb{R}$

Just a thought : This is a special case of DE, since the function that gives the second derivative is not continous. In particular, we don't have the usual theorems of existence.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for the answer. I need to look at it with a little more attention since the solutions were not what I would expect for the problem. Thank you once again. $\endgroup$ – PML Apr 26 '13 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ The basic idea is that we can solve the DE very easily if x stays positive, stays negative, or stays zero. The problem comes when x changes sign : can we then create a solution with cut-and-paste ? The answer is no. That's why my answer is a big wall of text with no calculus. $\endgroup$ – justt Apr 26 '13 at 22:25
  • $\begingroup$ After reading your proof with more attention I got it. Thank you again for your time $\endgroup$ – PML Apr 26 '13 at 22:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.