0
$\begingroup$

Let $f:X \rightarrow Y$ be a bijective, continuous map between two toplogical spaces. Does X being compact and Hausdorff imply that $f$ must be a homeomorphism? I think it doesn't but I can not find an example.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be your favourite compact Hausdorff space with at least $2$ points, let $Y$ be $X$ with the trivial topology, consider the identity as $f$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think you should specify what you mean by trivial: is it the discrete topology or the anti-discrete topology? This clearly cannot be true for the discrete topology since $f$ itself need not be continuous. $\endgroup$ – weierstrash Jun 26 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @PankajTiwari trivial is the common name for the topology with only two open sets even though some authors use indiscrete or other names $\endgroup$ – Alessandro Codenotti Jun 26 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ I thought the OP might not be familiar with the terminology so might end up getting confused. Anyways you're answer is of course correct so +1! $\endgroup$ – weierstrash Jun 26 at 16:31
  • $\begingroup$ Also many people use the Hausdorff condition as an axiom for a topological space so one has to double check what defintions they're using. $\endgroup$ – weierstrash Jun 26 at 16:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.