I need to find the 2nd term of continued fraction for the power tower ${^5}e=e^{e^{e^{e^{e}}}}$ ( i.e. $\lfloor\{e^{e^{e^{e^{e}}}}\}^{-1}\rfloor$), or even higher towers. The number is too big to process in reasonable time with numerical libraries or algorithms known to me — the 1st term of the continued fraction has more than $10^{10^6}$ decimal digits. Is there a trick that allows to do such calculations faster?

UPDATE: I created a sequence A225053 in OEIS for 2nd terms of continued fractions for power towers $e,\,e^e,\,e^{e^e},\,\dots$ Please feel free to extend it if you find a way to calculate further terms.

  • $\begingroup$ Have you looked at Euler's continued fraction formula for the exponential function? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… It probably won't help you get an exact answer, but it may show you that it's not 0. $\endgroup$ Apr 29, 2013 at 22:04

1 Answer 1


It might be not a direct answer to your question, but it is possible that there is no 2nd term of the continued fraction in question.

I believe it is a long-standing open problem if $\,{^5 e}\in\mathbb{N}$, and, in general, for every integer $n \ge 5$, if $\,{^n e}\in\mathbb{N}$ (and also, for every integer $n \ge 4$, if $\,{^n \pi}\in\mathbb{N}$).

It is mentioned multiple times in Wikipedia, e.g. in Russian Wikipedia article Открытые математические проблемы (Open mathematical problems) and on some mailing lists. Similar questions were discussed here on Math.SE: $e^{e^{e^{79}}}$ and ultrafinitism, How to show $e^{e^{e^{79}}}$ is not an integer. Currently these questions look very far from being resolved and it is completely unclear how to approach them.

  • 10
    $\begingroup$ I wonder, does anybody really believe it can be an integer? $\endgroup$ May 5, 2013 at 19:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .