4
$\begingroup$

Let $f: \mathbb R \rightarrow\mathbb R $ be twice continuously differentiable. Suppose further that $f$ is bounded and $f’’(x)\geq 0$ for every $x \in \mathbb R $. Then prove that $f$ is infinitely differentiable.

Except constant functions I am not able to get any function satisfying the hypothesis. The exponential function satisfies all properties but is unbounded. $\arctan$ satisfies all properties except that its second derivative is not nonnegative in $\mathbb R$. Are there non-constant functions satisfying the hypothesis? How do we prove the result?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ So, $f$ is bounded convex function. Now follow, math.stackexchange.com/questions/518091/… $\endgroup$
    – User
    Jun 20 '20 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ The claim is that all bounded and convex functions on $\mathbb{R}$ that are twice differentiable are also infinitely differentiable. That doesn't sound like it is true? If you start with a non-decreasing $f'''$ that has kinks and integrate back up to $f$, you'll construct a twice continuously differentiable function with a non-differentiable third derivative, but no apparent contradictions? $\endgroup$
    – user762914
    Jun 20 '20 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/questions/513887/… $\endgroup$
    – User
    Jun 20 '20 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ The non negativity of the second derivative implies convexity only in a bounded interval. Refer Baby Rudin. Here the interval is the whole Real line which is unbounded. $\endgroup$ Jun 20 '20 at 15:53
  • $\begingroup$ The non negativity of the second derivative implies convexity in any interval, bounded or unbounded. $\endgroup$
    – Angelo
    Jun 20 '20 at 16:35
2
$\begingroup$

It is sufficient to prove that $f$ is constant in $]-\infty,+\infty[$.

If it was not constant there would exists $x_0\in \mathbb{R}$ such that $f’(x_0)\ne0 $. There are only two possibilities: $f’(x_0)>0$ or $f’(x_0)<0$.

Without loss of generality we can suppose that $f’(x_0)>0$.

The hypothesis $f’’(x)\ge0$ for all $x\in \mathbb{R}$ implies that $f’(x)$ is a monotone nondecreasing function, so $f’(x)\ge f’(x_0)>0$ for all $x\in ]x_0,+\infty[$.

Moreover for all $x \in ]x_0, +\infty[$ we can apply Langrange Theorem to the interval $[x_0,x]$, so there exists $c \in ]x_0,x[$ such that $f(x)-f(x_0)=f’(c)(x-x_0)\ge f’(x_0)(x-x_0)$.

It means that $f(x)\ge f(x_0)+f’(x_0)(x-x_0)$ for all $x \in ]x_0, +\infty[$. So $f$ is not bounded from above in $]x_0, +\infty[$, but it is absurd because it contradicts one of the hypothesis.

Hence it is impossible that $f$ is not constant in $]-\infty,+\infty[$.

It means $f$ is constant in $]-\infty,+\infty[$, so it is infinitely differentiable.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Great solution!! Absolutely spot on!! Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ Jun 20 '20 at 20:30
2
$\begingroup$

As you concluded, the only continuous bounded convex functions on $\mathbb R$ are constant functions. One characterization of convex functions is that their graphs lie above their tangent lines: $f(x)\ge f(a)+f'(a)(x-a)$ for all $x$ and $a$. If $f$ is bounded, so if $x\mapsto f(a)+f'(a)(x-a)$, so $f'(a)=0$, and so on.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.