0
$\begingroup$

Let $f:\mathcal{Z}\times\mathcal{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function defined on a compact metric space $(\mathcal{Z},\rho)$ such that $\forall z_1,z_2\in\mathcal{Z}$ \begin{equation} \label{eq1} |f(z_1)-f(z_2)|\le L\rho(z_1,z_2)+K\alpha \end{equation} where $L,K$ and $\alpha$ are constants.

I want to show that $f$ is bounded from above. Now, Extreme Value theorem can be used to show that a continuous function on a compact space is bounded.

Can I say that $f$ is continuous because for all $z_1,z_2\in\mathcal{Z}, \epsilon>0$, whenever $\rho(z_1,z_2)<\epsilon$, $|f(z_1)-f(z_2)|<L\epsilon+K\alpha$.

or Let's look at a modified version of this question:

Let $f:\mathcal{Z}\times\mathcal{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function defined on a compact metric space $(\mathcal{Z},\rho)$ such that $\forall z_1,z_2\in\mathcal{Z}$ \begin{equation} |f(z_1,e_1)-f(z_2,e_2)|\le L\rho(z_1,z_2)+K\|e_1-e_2\| \end{equation} where $L,K$ and $\|e_1-e_2\|\leq\alpha$ are constants.

I want to show that $f$ is bounded from above. Now, Extreme Value theorem can be used to show that a continuous function on a compact space is bounded.

Can I now say that $f$ is continuous because for all $z_1,z_2\in\mathcal{Z}, \epsilon>0$, whenever $\rho(z_1,z_2)<\epsilon$, $|f(z_1)-f(z_2)|<L\epsilon+K\alpha$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ No you can't conclude continuity. You can't make $K \alpha$ small because it is fixed. $\endgroup$
    – J. De Ro
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ I have included a modified version of the question. Can we now say that it is continuous and thus bounded due to EVT? $\endgroup$
    – amj
    Commented May 28, 2020 at 5:19

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It can be discontinuous. For example, chose a particular point $x$, and define $f(z)$ to be $K\alpha$ if $z = x$, $0$ if not. Then this is discontinuous but for all $z_1$, $z_2$, you have $|f(z_1)-f(z_2)| \leqslant K\alpha \leqslant L\rho(z_1,z_2) + K\alpha$.

What is true is that $f$ is bounded because for $z,t_0 \in \mathcal{Z}$ \begin{align} |f(z)| &=|f(z)-f(t_0) + f(t_0)| \\ & \leqslant |f(z)-f(t_0)| + |f(t_0)| \\&\leqslant L \rho(z,t_0) + K\alpha + |f(t_0)| \\&\leqslant L\mathrm{diam}\mathcal{Z} + K\alpha + |f(t_0)| \end{align} (recall that $\mathcal{Z}$ is compact thus as a finite diameter.) So if $t$ is fixed, $f$ is bounded by the constant $L\mathrm{diam}\mathcal{Z} + K\alpha + |f(t_0)|$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ but what about $|f(t)|$. I mean it can still be unbounded? $\endgroup$
    – amj
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ If $t$ is fixed, this is a constant. Thus $f(z)$ is bounded by a constant not depending on $z$. $\endgroup$
    – Didier
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry but I don't understand it. Is $t\in\mathcal{Z}$? then how can we say that $f(t)$ can't be unbounded? Please accept my apology if it should be self evident. $\endgroup$
    – amj
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ As $\mathcal{Z}$ is an abstract set, it does not have a particular point. So I choose $t \in \mathcal{Z}$. But if it was the ball of radius $1$, I would have choosen its center. I would then have shown that for any point $z$ in the ball, $|f(z)|$ would have been bounded by some constant, involving the diameter of the ball and the value of $f$ at its center. Here, $f(z)$ cannot be too far away from the value of $f$ at the particular point $t$ I choose before. $\endgroup$
    – Didier
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 10:34
  • $\begingroup$ I think I get it. I think. Thanks $\endgroup$
    – amj
    Commented May 27, 2020 at 10:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .