0
$\begingroup$

I'm not sure if these details matter, but anyway for this particular case, consider a compact abelian group $G$ with operation $\cdot$, a Haar measure $\mu$ on it and $f$ a non-trivial character on $G$. (I'm looking at this question: The integral of a character is $0$)

I've seen stated that for $x,y\in G$,

$$\int_G f(x)\>d\mu(x)=\int_G f(x\cdot y)\>d\mu(x\cdot y).$$

Is this true? If so why? What's the general theory behind it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: recall the definition of (right/left) Haar measure (in particular, recall that $\mu(xA)=\mu(A)$). First show that the equation holds for simple functions, and then use a density argument to prove the general case. $\endgroup$ – Manuel Norman May 24 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ @ManuelNorman I think the part that's tripping me up is if we know $\mu(xA)=\mu(A)$, why does that hold for $d\mu$? $\endgroup$ – J.Smith May 24 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ This is usually a choice of notation: for instance, you could also simply write $d \mu$, or $\mu (dx)$; sometimes, it is not even explicitely written. $\endgroup$ – Manuel Norman May 24 at 20:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.