2
$\begingroup$

A normal operator is defined as $AA^{*}\ =A^{*}A$

Where A is an operator

how do i show the sum of two normal operators is normal? Or find a counter example that shows this is false?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That is not a definition. For one thing, $x$ needs to be quantified. Will you please provide your assumptions? Operators on what? A complex Hilbert space? Typically a normal operator on a Hilbert space is defined to be an operator that commutes with its adjoint, and it can be proved that an operator $A$ on a Hilbert space $H$ is normal if and only if $\|Ax\|=\|A^*x\|$ for all $x\in H$. It might be easier to answer this question using the usual definition, that $A^*A=AA^*$. $\endgroup$ – Jonas Meyer Apr 22 '13 at 0:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Notice that if $A,B$ are normal, you're interested in whether $(A+B)(A+B)^*=(A+B)(A^*+B^*)=AA^*+AB^*+BA^*+BB^*=A^*A+A^*B+B^*A+B^*B$. But you're not given that $AB^*=B^*A$ or $BA^*=A^*B$, so you should figure it's false. I'd look for counterexamples where $A$ and $B$ are unitary acting on $\Bbb{C}^2$. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Carlson Apr 22 '13 at 2:47
4
$\begingroup$

Try $U_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$, $U_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$. Both are unitary, hence normal. However $U_1+U_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}$, and $(U_1+U_2) e_1 = 0$, but $(U_1+U_2)^* e_1 = 2 e_2$, hence $U_1+U_2$ is not normal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.