In a Tychonoff space X we have:

a)If $U_1\supset U_2 \supset ...$ is a decreasing sequence of nonempty open sets in $X$, then $\cap \overline{U_n} \neq \emptyset$.

b)Every countable open cover of $X$ has a finite collection whose closures cover $X$.

Problem Prove, directly, a) implies b).

My attempt. Let $\mathbf{O}=\{O_n: n\in \mathbb{N}\}$ a countable open cover of $X$. Let $U_1= \cup_{n=1}^{\infty}{O_n}, U_2=U_1- O_1, U_3=U_2-O_2,...$ We see $U_1 \supset U_2 \supset ...$ Exists $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\forall m \geq N $, $U_m \subset X$ and $U_m \supset U_{m+1} \supset..$, then thoses open sets are subsets of $X$ and a decreasing sequence, then $\cap \overline{U_m} \neq \emptyset$, but I don't see how to have a subcollection of that $U_m$ cush that $X \subset \cup_{i=1}^{n_0} \overline{U_{m_i}}$. Could you help me?, please.


Unfortunately, $U_1\setminus O_1$ need not be open, so you won’t be able to apply (a) to your sets $U_n$.

For $n\in\Bbb Z^+$ let


then each $U_n$ is open, and $U_n\supseteq U_{n+1}$ for each $n\in\Bbb Z^+$. There are two possibilities. If some $U_n=\varnothing$, then $\bigcup_{k=1}^n\operatorname{cl}O_k=X$, and we’re done.

Otherwise we can apply (a) to conclude that

$$\begin{align*} \varnothing&\ne\bigcap_{n\ge 1}U_n\\ &=\bigcap_{n\ge 1}\left(X\setminus\bigcup_{k=1}^n\operatorname{cl}O_k\right)\\ &=X\setminus\bigcup_{n\ge 1}\left(\bigcup_{k=1}^n\operatorname{cl}O_k\right)\\ &=X\setminus\bigcup_{n\ge 1}\operatorname{cl}O_n\\ &\subseteq X\setminus\bigcup\mathbf{O}\\ &=\varnothing\;; \end{align*}$$

this is impossible, so some $U_n$ must be empty, and $\mathbf{O}$ must have a finite subfamily whose closures cover $X$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.