I learned that an elementary differential form was one like $dx^{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx^{i_n}$ where $1\leq i_1<\cdots < i_n\leq n$ if we are on an real $n$-dimensional manifold. I'm trying to learn about complex differential forms, but I am getting confused about the introduction of $d\overline{z}$. The crux of my question is if I want to take a complex contour integral on a complex analytic $n$-dimensional (with respect to $\mathbb{C}$ basis) manifold what does it look like? I had imagined that if I had a complex function, $f$, defined on my complex analytic $n$-dimensional manifold, then the integral would look like $\int_C fdz^1\wedge\cdots\wedge dz^n$. But I keep seeing use of $d\overline{z}$, and I don't know how this fits in.

I've also seen a few complexification arguments in my reading, but if this can be done without considering the real space, I would prefer to do it that way. Any advice is much appreciated!


1 Answer 1


First, in your first line, you needn't have an $n$-form on an $n$-dimensional manifold. I would write a general $k$-form as a linear combination of $dx^{i_1}\wedge\dots\wedge dx^{i_k}$ with $1\le i_1<\dots<i_k\le n$.

Next, if you want to think about integrating a top-degree form over an $n$-dimensional complex manifold, you will want $$f(z)dz^1\wedge d\bar z^1\wedge\dots\wedge dz^n\wedge d\bar z^n,$$ often referred to as a form of type $(n,n)$. In general, a form of type $(p,q)$ will be a linear combination of forms of the type $$f(z)dz^{j_1}\wedge\dots\wedge dz^{j_p}\wedge d\bar z^{k_1}\wedge\dots\wedge d\bar z^{k_q}.$$ If you're thinking about the analog of residue computations in one complex variable, what you'll actually want to do is integrate a meromorphic $n$-form $$\omega = h(z)dz^1\wedge\dots\wedge dz^n$$ (where $h(z)$ is a meromorphic function, typically with poles along a divisor with normal crossings) over an $n$-cycle $\Gamma$. For example, if $h(z) = \dfrac{f(z)}{g_1(z)\dots g_n(z)}$, with $f$ and all $g_j$ holomorphic, then the immediate generalization of the classical residue computation will be $\displaystyle\int_\Gamma \omega$ for $\Gamma = \{|g_j|=\varepsilon, j=1,\dots,n\}$. You can see more about such things in, e.g., Griffiths and Harris, Chapter 5.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much! This is extremely helpful and clear. Much appreciated. $\endgroup$ May 22, 2020 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.