Laplace-Beltrami Operator in terms of the Hodge-$\star$-Operator and the Codiferential Given a riemannian Mainifold $(M,g)$, the Hodge-$\star$-Operator, the codifferential as 
$$\delta:\Omega^k(M)\rightarrow\Omega^{k-1}(M):\omega\mapsto(-1)^{n(k-1)-1}\star d\star \omega$$ and the Laplacian as
$$\Delta:\Omega^k(M)\rightarrow\Omega^k(M):\omega\mapsto d\delta \omega+\delta d \omega.$$
I want to proof that the Laplacian in local coordinates is given by
$$\Delta f=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{\det g}}\sum_{ij}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(\sqrt{\det g}\cdot g^{ij}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j}).$$
I only know about the Hodge-$\star$-Operator that $\star^2=(-1)^{k(n-k)}$ and $\alpha\wedge\star\beta=<\alpha,\beta>dVol$.
I started with \begin{align}
\Delta f=&d(\delta f) + \delta d f\\
=&\delta d f\\
=& (-1)^{n-1}\star d \star d f\\
=&(-1)^{n-1}\star d \star \sum \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} dx_i\\
=&(-1)^{n-1}\star d \sum \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \star dx_i
\end{align}
Here i got stuck with the identities of the Hodge-$\star$-Operator. I don't see where i could get that $g^{ij}$ from. I have seen definitions of the $\star$-Operator which involve these but i couldn't show any equivalence.
 A: Given an orientable Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$, the Laplacian and the Hodge-star-operator as before.
To show:$$\Delta f=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{\det g}}\sum_{ij}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(\sqrt{\det g}\cdot g^{ij}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j}).$$
We know that $\star^2=(-1)^{k(n-k)}$ and $\alpha\wedge\star\beta=\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle dVol$.
Using the hints of @Keshav. We can display the product of the basis of differential forms as
\begin{align}
\langle dx_i,dx_j\rangle = \sum g^{kl}\delta_{ik}\delta_{jl}=g^{ij}. 
\end{align}
Also looking at the base of n-1-forms we can display $\star dx_i$ as $\star dx_i=\sum_{l=1}^n P_l \hat{dx}_l\wedge dx_1\wedge \dots \wedge dx_n$ for some $P_l:M\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
Let's combine these two ideas
\begin{align}
g^{ij}dVol&=\langle dx_i,dx_j\rangle dVol\\
&=dx_i\wedge\star dx_j\\
&=\sum_{l=1}^n P_l dx_l\wedge \hat{dx_l}\wedge dx_i\wedge\dots\wedge dx_n\\
&\text{the base of the n-1-forms and the 1 forms cancels out if }i\neq j\\
&=P_i(-1)^i dx_1\wedge\dots\wedge dx_n
\end{align}
So we can finish the proof with \begin{align}
\Delta f=&d(\delta f) + \delta d f\\
=&\delta d f\\
=& (-1)^{n-1}\star d \star d f\\
=&(-1)^{n-1}\star d \star \sum \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} dx_i\\
=&(-1)^{n-1}\star d (\sum \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \star dx_i)\\
=&(-1)^{n-1}\star d (\sum \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}(\sum (-1)^ig^{ji} \sqrt{|g|}\hat{dx_j}\wedge dx_1\wedge\dots\wedge dx_n))\\
&\text{putting things in order and using linearity of the exterior derivative we get}\\
=& (-1)\frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\sum\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} g^{ij}\sqrt{|g|})dx_1\wedge\dots\wedge dx_n 
\end{align}
