3
$\begingroup$

Let $f$ be a function that is continuous on $[0,1]$ and differentiable on $(0,1)$ with $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ and let $k_1,k_2,...,k_n$ be any positive numbers. Prove that there are $n$ pairwise distinct numbers $t_1,t_2,...,t_n$ in $(0,1)$ such that $$\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{k_i}{f^{\prime}(t_i)}}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}{k_i}$$

My attempt: By MVT, there exists $c \in (0,1)$ such that $$f^{\prime}(c)=\dfrac{f(1)-f(0)}{1-0}=1$$

My aim is to show that for all $t_i$, $1 \leq i \leq n$, $f^{\prime}(t_i)=1$ because this seems to be the most natural way to prove it. But I can only prove for one number only. Also I don't understand what $t_i$ intuitively is. Can anyone guide me on this question?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The title is great $\endgroup$ – gukoff Apr 19 '13 at 12:25
  • $\begingroup$ You definitely can't show that there are $n$ points where $f'(t_i)=1$, since e.g. $\sin (\pi x/2)$ has only one such point! To help you get thinking, imagine picking some fairly random set of ${t_i}$ and varying them. What can happen? $\endgroup$ – Sharkos Apr 19 '13 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Harold: The original title was so great that I cannot help but change it. $\endgroup$ – Hu Zhengtang Apr 19 '13 at 19:50
5
$\begingroup$

Denote $y_0=0$, and for $1\le i\le n$, denote $y_i=\frac{\sum_{j=1}^i k_j}{\sum_{j=1}^n k_j}$. Then $0=y_0<y_1<\dots<y_{n-1}<y_n=1$. Denote $x_0=0$ and $x_n=1$. Since $f$ is continuous, and since $f(x_0)=y_0$, $f(x_n)=y_n$, by intermediate value theorem, we can inductively find $x_0<x_1<\dots<x_{n-1}<x_n$, such that for $1\le i\le n-1$, $f(x_i)=y_i$. Then by mean value theorem, for $1\le i\le n$, there exists $t_i\in(x_{i-1},x_i)$, such that $$f'(t_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})=f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})=\frac{k_i}{\sum_{j=1}^n k_j}>0.$$ It follows that $$\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{k_i}{f'(t_i)}=\sum_{j=1}^n k_j\cdot\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i-x_{i-1})=\sum_{i=1}^n k_i.$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What motivates you to consider to define $y_i$? $\endgroup$ – Idonknow Apr 19 '13 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Idonknow: My idea is to let $f'(t_i)=\frac{f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})}{x_i-x_{i-1}}$, where $0=x_0<x_1<\dots<x_n=1$. Then I have to prove $\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{k_i(x_i-x_{i-1})}{f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})}=\sum_{i=1}^nk_i$. Then it is natural to take $f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})=\frac{k_i}{\sum_{i=1}^nk_i}$. $\endgroup$ – 23rd Apr 19 '13 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ Then what motivates you to think of $f^{\prime}(t_i)$? $\endgroup$ – Idonknow Apr 19 '13 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Idonknow: Do you mean why I consider to let $f'(t_i)=\frac{f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})}{x_i-x_{i-1}}$? $\endgroup$ – 23rd Apr 19 '13 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, can you elaborate on it? $\endgroup$ – Idonknow Apr 19 '13 at 16:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.