-1
$\begingroup$

I don't understand how the two theorems in the title conciliate. Namely, suppose that $f$ is entire with growth order $\rho$, and $f$ vanish in the points $a_1, a_2 \dots$ , and eventually in $0$; then Hadamard factorization theorem states that we can write $f$ as $$e^{P(z)}z^m \prod_{n=1}^\infty E_k\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)\ ,$$ where $k$ is the largest integer lower than $\rho$, and $P(z)$ is a polynomial of degree $\le k$. Obviously, $m$ is the order of the zero in $0$, and $E_k$ is the canonical factor.

Weierstrass theorem states that, given the sequence $a_0=0,a_1, a_2 \dots$ (we can consider the same $a_n$ as above since, excluding that $f$ is identically zero, it's true that $|a_n|\to \infty$) there is an entire function $g$ vanishing only in the $a_n$. This function $g$ is obtained as $$(*) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ e^{h(z)}z^m \prod_{n=1}^\infty E_n\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)\ ,$$ with $h(z)$ an holomorphic function.

My problem is that I don't understand how we can construct our function $f$, using Weierstrass theorem, from the sequence of the $a_n$ (namely, to have $f=g$); it should be possible, since every entire function vanishing in the $a_n$ is of the form $(*)$, right? I intuitively understand that, if we want $g$ to have growth order equal to $\rho$ (necessary to obtain $f=g$), it is reasonable to take $h(z)=P(z)$, with $\deg P \lt k$; I say "intuitively" and "reasonable" because we didn't study the proof of Hadamard theorem, only the statement. However I don't understand how the two products $\prod_n E_k(z/a_n)$ and $\prod_n E_n(z/a_n)$ can be equal, since in one product the degrees are fixed and in the other they increase with $n$. Can you clarify my ideas? Thanks a lot

I make an edit, since I gave a look also to the product formula for the sine function, namely $$\frac {\sin \pi z} \pi = z\prod_{n=1}^\infty \Bigl(1-\frac{z^2}{n^2}\Bigl)\ .$$ It is clear that this infinite product converges and that the zeros of this product are exactly the zeros of $\sin \pi z$; however I still don't understand how we could obtain it using Weierstrass theorem with the sequence $\{0,1,-1,2,-2,\dots \}$. Maybe we could take the $h(z)$ equal to the inverse of the product of the exponential part of the canonical factors?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I’m not sure I fully understand your question, but notice that Weierstrass factorisation is not unique. $\endgroup$ Apr 27 '20 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ @ThomasShelby my question, in a few words, is: I take an entire function $f$, of finite order, that vanishes in the points $\{a_n\}_n$; now, if I use Weierstrass theorem on $\{a_n\}_n$, how is possible to obtain $f$? I mean, it must be possible because every entire function vanishing in $\{a_n\}_n$ can be obtained applying Weierstrass to $\{a_n\}_n$ and eventually multiplying for some $e^{h(z)}$; however I explained in the paragraph starting with "My problem is" why I can't understand how we can actually obtain our initial $f$ using Weierstrass on the set $\{a_n\}_n$. Thanks a lot $\endgroup$
    – Dorian
    Apr 27 '20 at 20:00
2
$\begingroup$

Given a sequence $\{a_n\}$ of complex numbers with $a_n\neq 0$ for all $n\geq1$ and $|a_n|\to\infty$ as $n\to\infty$, you probably know that the function $\tilde f(z)=\prod_{n=1}^\infty E_n\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$ is an entire function vanishing only at the $a_n$. But there's nothing special about the product $\prod_{n=1}^\infty E_n\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$. Suppose $\{a_n\}$ is a sequence of complex numbers with $a_n\neq 0$ for all $n\geq1$ and $|a_n|\to\infty$ as $n\to\infty.$ If $\{p_n\}$ is any sequence of integers such that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{|a_n|}\right)^{p_n+1}< \infty$, then $\prod_{n=1}^\infty E_{p_n}\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$ is an entire function with zeros only at $a_n$(for a proof, see Conway). Since $|a_n|\to\infty$, there is an $N$ such that $|a_n|> 2$ for all $n\geq N$. Thus we see that $\sum_{n= 1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{|a_n|}\right)^{n}$ converges and therefore $p_n=n-1$ is a choice. Notice that the same holds for $p_n\geq n-1$.

Now, if we want the function $\tilde f$ to have a zero (of order $m\geq 0$) at $z=0$ as well, $f(z)=z^m\prod_{n=1}^\infty E_{p_n}\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$ will do the job. If $g$ is another entire function which vanishes only at the above prescribed points, it will be of the form $f(z)e^{h(z)}$, where $h$ is some entire function(consider the nowhere vanishing entire function $\frac g{f}$). This is summarized as follows:

Weierstrass Factorization Theorem. Let $f$ be an entire function and let $\{a_n\}$ be the non-zero zeros of $f$ repeated according to multiplicity. Suppose $f$ has a zero of order $m\geq 0$ at $z=0$. Then there exists a sequence of integers $\{p_n\}$ such that $f(z)= e^{h(z)}z^m \prod_{n=1}^\infty E_{p_n}\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$ for some entire function $h$.

Now if $f$ is an entire function with growth order $\rho$, then one can show that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{|a_n|}\right)^{k+1}< \infty$, where $k$ is the largest integer less than or equal to $\rho$(again, see Conway or Stein-Shakarchi for a proof). Thus, we have $f(z)= e^{h(z)}z^m \prod_{n=1}^\infty E_{k}\Bigl(\frac z {a_n}\Bigl)$ for some entire function $h$. Again, it takes some effort to establish that the entire function $h$ is indeed a polynomial.

I hope this helps.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.