1
$\begingroup$

Does anyone know how the method of logarithmic accuracy works and what do I have to know about it (as far as applied Mathematics is concerned)? Any references, examples or guidelines would be appreciated.

Thank you

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Where have you seen it? A Google search didn't turn up anything that looked right. $\endgroup$ Apr 16 '13 at 20:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have seen in a Quantum Mechanics class, in which the professor used the method to solve an integral with infrared divergence. However, I did not ask the question in the physics exchange because it appeared to be a pure mathematical question that could have been answered better by a mathematician. $\endgroup$
    – Heber
    Apr 16 '13 at 21:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am a physicist and I have no idea what you mean by "infrared divergence." $\endgroup$
    – Ron Gordon
    Apr 16 '13 at 21:21
2
$\begingroup$

A quantity is said to be calculated “to logarithmic accuracy” when in an expansion like $$ F(\varepsilon) = c \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} A^n \sum_{m=2}^{n} a_{n,m} \ln^{n-m}(\varepsilon/E) ~, $$ only the coefficients $a_{n,m}$ associated with the most divergent terms are calculated exactly while the coefficients for $m>2$ are determined by an approximation procedure.

ref: Duke, C. B., and S. D. Silverstein, “Does Logarithmic Accuracy Uniquely Define the Low‐Temperature Properties of Dilute Magnetic Alloy Systems?”, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 708, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2163592 .

As a side remark, infra-red divergence, i.e., divergence of calculated physical quantities at low energy/momentum/temperature scales, is a widely known (and perhaps, ubiquitous) issue in current-day condensed matter physics, and has many important consequences.

In models of condensed matter physics, ultraviolet divergences present not a problem but a nuisance. Their presence indicates that the continuum description is incomplete, i.e. the behaviour of long-wavelength excitations depends on shorter length scales. ... . Infrared divergences are more interesting. Their appearance is always an indication of an incorrectly chosen reference ground state. For example, if electrons in a metal attract, it is wrong to approximate them as free particles; the real ground state is a superconducting condensate of electron pairs. This ground state is orthogonal to the ground state of the non-interacting electron gas and therefore is unreachable by a perturbation expansion. There is no universal recipe for how to choose a correct ground state. Sometimes it is relatively easy (as for ordinary superconductors), sometimes it is not easy at all.

[Tsvelik, A. M. Quantum field theory in condensed matter physics. Cambridge University Press (2006), p. 48]

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.