I would interpret $\sum_{i=1}^2 x_i + y$ as $x_1 + x_2 + y$, but I would interpret $\sum_{i=1}^2 x_i + y_i$ as $x_1 + y_1 + x_2 + y_2$. I realize this is a little inconsistent. Should the latter be written as $\sum_{i=1}^2 (x_i + y_i)$?

Or, in other words, does the sum operator have precedence over + and - ?


It should be written with parentheses to avoid ambiguity, yes. If you think about the "sum" symbol as a function, it makes sense:

$$ \sum(\cdot) $$

This is a function which takes a list $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots\}$ of numbers (or other mathematical objects which you might want to add), and adds them in order. This list could be finite or infinite: the "sum" function figures out how long the list is, and adjusts its indexing accordingly (i.e. if there are 10 things in the list, your index will go from $1$ to $10$).

If you want to add a sequence which is itself the addition of two sequences, like your example of $\{x_1+y_1,x_2+y_2\}$, you'll need to drop the whole sequence into the function:

$$ \sum(\{x_1+y_1,x_2+y_2\})=\sum_{i=1}^2(x_i+y_i) $$

For finite sums of numbers, we always have the property that

$$ \sum(\{x_1,x_2,\ldots\}+\{y_1,y_2,\ldots\})=\sum(\{x_1,x_2,\ldots\})+\sum(\{y_1,y_2,\ldots\}) $$ however the following would have a different interpretation:

$$ \sum(\{x_1,x_2,\ldots\})+\{y_1,y_2,\ldots\} $$

Hence the parentheses!

Interesting, yet more advanced side note: "breaking up" a sum doesn't always work if the sequences are infinite!

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks! Does this mean that if I wrote $\sum_{i=1}^2 x_i + y_i$, you would read it as $x_1 + x_2 + y_i$? Or would you have understood that I meant $x_1 + y_1 + x_2 + y_2$? Or would you just have thought "Geez, what sloppy notation!" :) $\endgroup$ – Nagel Apr 16 '13 at 15:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Most people would understand what is meant, but yes we would also think it was a bit sloppy =) I see $\int f+g$ all the time as well, similar confusion. $\endgroup$ – icurays1 Apr 16 '13 at 16:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Correct, but sometimes people are lazy and don't put the 'dx'. $\endgroup$ – icurays1 Apr 16 '13 at 17:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ However, $\Sigma^2_{i=1} x_i + y$ would be $x_1 + x_2 + 2y$. If that is your intention, it would be preferable to write $\Sigma^2_{i=1} (x_i + y)$. Otherwise, one would write $y + \Sigma^2_{i=1} x_i$, which would be unambiguously taken to mean $x_1 + x_2 + y$ . $\endgroup$ – colormegone Apr 16 '13 at 17:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Agreed. So $\sum_{i=1}^2 x_i + y$ would be considered somewhat ambiguous, or would most people take it to mean $y+\sum_{i=1}^2 x_i$ without hesitation? $\endgroup$ – Nagel Apr 16 '13 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.