Non-parametric binomial control problem I'm trying to solve the following problem:

It is known that for the last few years the percentage of students passing the course 'non-parametric statistics' is no more than 35%. This year 10 students were randomly chosen as a sample and their grades were the following:
$$ 3.0\space\space 8.0\space\space  7.0\space\space  4.0\space\space  4.0\space\space  0.0\space\space  2.0\space\space  6.0\space\space  2.0\space\space 5.0\space\space $$ 
The required grade to pass the course is 5.0 . Applying percentage control (or maybe quantile test - I can't find the proper translation from my language) check whether this year's results coincide with those of the previous years(using a=0.1).

This is my attempt at a solution:
$$\text{Let X be the grade of a randomly chosen student.}\\
P(X\ge5.0)\le0.35 \\
Y_i =
\begin{cases}
1,  & X_i\ge5.0 \\
0, & \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}\\
Y_i\sim B(1,p)\space\space\space\space\space\space p=P(Y_i=1)=P(X_i\ge5.0)\\
H_0:p\le0.35\space\space\space\space H_1:p>0.35\\
\text{or  } H_0:X_{0.35}\ge5.0 \space\space\space\space H_1:X_{0.35}<5.0\\
\phi(\underline x)=\begin{cases}
1,  &T>t \\
0, & \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}\\
T\sim B(10,0.35)\\P_{\frac{1}{2}}(T\le t)=1-a=0.9\\
\text{Looking at a binomial distribution table we find that t=5 for a=0.0949. }\\P_{\frac{1}{2}}(T\le 5)=0.9051\\ \text{We can also see that out of the 10 students, 4 passed the course.}\\\text{ So }τ=4<t=5\\ \text{Does this mean we accept }H_0 \text{? Is the whole approach correct?}.$$
 A: You are on the right track. Because you have doubts about English
statistical terminology, I will go through the problem with my explanation
of what is going on.
I suppose you are testing $H_0: p \le 0.35$ against $H_a: p > .35,$
where $p$ is the proportion who pass.
Your data show $T = 4$ passing
out of $n=10$ randomly chosen subjects. Under the null hypowthesis,
$T \sim \mathsf{Binom}(n=10, p = .35).$
g = c(3.0, 8.0, 7.0, 4.0, 4.0, 0.0, 2.0, 6.0, 2.0, 5.0)  
sum(g >= 5)
[1] 4

We would reject $H_0$ for large values of $T.$ A pass rate this year of $\hat p = 4/10 = 0.4 > 0.35$ may be grounds for some encouragement. But is this enough improvement to be 
statistically significant?
The P-value of the test is $P(T \ge 4) = 1 - P(X \le 5) = 0.0949.$ [Computation in R, where pbinom is a binomial CDF.]
1 - pbinom(5, 10, .35) 
0.09493408

In order to reject $H_0,$ at level $\alpha = 0.1,$  the P-value has to be
smaller than 0.1, and it is (just barely). So you have evidence (at the 10% level of significance) to claim that the pass rate has improved.
Notes: (1) This result is not significant at the 5% level, which is used more often in practice than the 10% level used here.
(2) Depending on your course, you may be expected to solve some similar problems using
normal approximations to binomial probabilities. But $n$ is not large enough here
for a useful normal approximation.
