Let $X$ be a separated integral variety and $Y_1,Y_2$ two irreducible closed subvarieties. Show that if $\mathcal{O}_{X,Y_1}\subseteq \mathcal{O}_{X,Y_2}$ then $Y_2\subseteq Y_1$.

Here $\mathcal{O}_{X,Y_i}$ is the local ring of $X$ at the generic point of $Y_i$. This is a stronger form of this question.


For convenience we let $x,y$ be the generic points of $Y_1$ and $Y_2$.

Let $U$ be any affine open subscheme of $X$ containing $x$ and $V$ be some affine open subscheme of $V$ containing $y$.

Then $U \cap V$ is an affine scheme. Now $O(U \cap V)$ is the subring of $K(X)$ generated by $O(U)$ and $O(V)$, thus it has a natural morphism of $O(V)$-algebras $O(U \cap V) \rightarrow O_{X,y}$. This corresponds to the canonical map $\operatorname{Spec}\,O_{V,y} \rightarrow V$ factoring through the inclusion $U \cap V \rightarrow V$, thus implying $y \in U \cap V \subset U$.

So any open subset containing $x$ contains $y$, thus $Y_1 \subset Y_2$.

  • $\begingroup$ I have a question. By the separated assumption I know we have a surjective map $$\begin{align*} O(U)\otimes_k O(V)&\rightarrow O(U\cap V)\\ f\otimes g&\mapsto fg\end{align*}$$ but how do you get from here the map $O(U\cap V)\rightarrow O_{X,y}$? $\endgroup$ Apr 8 '20 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ Ooh I see know, every element in $O(U\cap V)$ is a sum of products $fg$, but as both $f,g$ are in $O_{X,y}$ ($f$ is there by the inclusion hypothesis) we get an inclusion $O(U\cap V)\hookrightarrow O_{X,y}$. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Apr 8 '20 at 18:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.