0
$\begingroup$

Let$A∈M_{n×n}(C)$ with characteristic polynomial $p(x) =cx^a\prod _{i=1}^{k}(λ_i−x)$ and $λ_i\not= 0,∀i,a∈Z_{>0}.$ Show that if $\dim(\ker(A)) +k=n$, then A is diagonalizable.

My proof:

Each linear factor in $p(x)$ has algebraic multiplicity 1, and $1 \leq \dim(E_x) \leq$ the algebraic multiplicity of $x$.

So $1 \leq \dim(E_x) \leq 1 \implies \dim(E_x) = 1$.

Therefore the algebraic multiplicity is equal to the geometric multiplicity for each eigenvector and A is diagonizable.

Is this proof valid? It seems too obvious and I didn't even use $\dim(\ker(A)) +k=n$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The statement is false, unless you assume that $\lambda_i\ne\lambda_j$, for $i\ne j$. About your question, $0$ is an eigenvalue as soon as $a>0$, and you need to take care of it, too. $\endgroup$ – egreg Apr 6 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ I'm finding your first point hard to understand, would you mind elaborating? The question guidelines imply that $λ_i \not= 0$, so would that also solve the second problem? $\endgroup$ – Pivot Apr 6 at 7:56
2
$\begingroup$

The statement is false, unless you make some further assumption. For every matrix, the characteristic polynomial has the stated form, but not every matrix is diagonalizable. Simple example: the characteristic polynomial of $$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$ is $p(x)=x\prod_{i=1}^2(\lambda_i-x)$, with $\lambda_1=\lambda_2=1$. This matrix is not diagonalizable.

The assumption under which the statement is true is that $\lambda_i\ne\lambda_j$, for $i\ne j$.

In this case your argument is good: each nonzero eigenvalue has algebraic multiplicity $1$. However, you also need to take care of the $0$ eigenvalue, when $a>0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.