3
$\begingroup$

I am solving an exercise from Dummit, Foote. Let $R$ be a ring with $1$. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. Every $R$-module is projective.

  2. Every $R$-module is injective.

Proof:

(1) implies that for any R-mod $A$ we have $Ext^i(-,A)$ is a zero functor. But this means that for any R-mod $Ext^i(L,A) = 0$ for all $A$ so $L$ is injective. I show $(2) \Rightarrow (1)$ exactly the same way.

It is quite easy so I am afraid I missed something. Is my proof correct?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There are two other equivalent conditions: every short exact sequence of $R$-modules is split, and $R$ is semisimple Artinian. $\endgroup$ – Geoffrey Trang Apr 17 at 21:44
5
$\begingroup$

It is correct. Another way to prove is through short exact sequences:

A $R$-module $P$ is projective if and only if every short exact sequence of $R$-modules $$0 \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow N \longrightarrow P \longrightarrow 0$$ splits and a $R$-module $I$ is injective if and only if every short exact sequence of $R$-modules $$0 \longrightarrow I \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow N \longrightarrow 0$$ splits.

Therefore, using these equivalences we have: every $R$-module is projective $\Leftrightarrow$ every short exact sequence of $R$-modules splits $\Leftrightarrow$ every $R$-module is injective.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.