2
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be a vector space over $\mathbb R$ with $\text{dim }V\geq k$ and let $M = \text{Mon}(\mathbb R^k, V)$ denote the space of monomorphisms (injective linear maps) of $\mathbb R^k$ into $V$.

Then there is a quotient map $M \rightarrow Gr(k,V)$. Is this a fibration? I think the map $M \rightarrow Gr(k,V)$ is equivalent to the quotient of $\text{Mon}(\mathbb R^k, V)$ by $GL(k)$ acting on the right by precomposition? I can't find any info on when quotients of smooth manifolds by a smooth action of a Lie group is a fiber bundle/fibration. Most theorems require that the smooth manifold be compact (which isn't true for my case).

Let's just assume that the map is a fibration for now... what is its fiber? I'm pretty sure that it is $GL(k)$ since the action of $GL(k)$ on $M$ is free. If $A,B \in GL(k)$ and $\phi:\mathbb R^k \rightarrow V$ is a monomorphism then obviously $\phi A = \phi B$ implies that $A = B$ since $\phi$ is mono.

I will accept any answer that proves whether $M \rightarrow Gr(k,V)$ is a fibration/fiber bundle or not but I am also curious about what the general theory of actions of lie groups on manifolds has to say and if there are general theorems that my question is a special case of!

Thanks in advance for any help!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

According to Moishe Kohan's answer here, if you have a free and proper action of a Lie group $G$ on a manifold $M$ (no assumptions about compactness on either $G$ or $M$), then the quotient map $M\rightarrow M/G$ is a $G$-principal bundle.

As you noted, there is a free action of $Gl(k)$ on $M$ given by precomposing. So let's prove that this action is proper, meaning that the map $\phi:G\times M\rightarrow M\times M$ given by $\phi(g,m)\rightarrow (gm, m)$ is proper.

To that end, first note the following, which confirms your guess that the fiber above any point is a copy of $Gl(k)$:

Proposition Given two maps $f_1,f_2\in M$, there is a $g\in GL(k)$ with $f_1 \circ g = f_2$ iff the image of $f_1$ is the same as the image of $f_2$. Further, if there is such a $g$, it is unique.

Proof: First, since $g:\mathbb{R}^k\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^k$ is an isomorphism, it's surjective so $f_2 = f_1\circ g$ has the same image as $f_1$.

Conversely, if $f_2$ and $f_1$ have the same image, define $g$ as follows. For each standard basis vector $e_i$ of $\mathbb{R}^k$, there is a unique element $v_i\in \mathbb{R}^k$ with $f_1(v_1) = f_2(e_i)$. Let $g$ be the matrix whose $i$th column is $v_i$. Then $f_1(g(e_i)) = f_1(v_i) = f_2(e_i)$, so $f_1\circ g = f_2$.

Finally, if both $g, g'$ satisfy $f_2 = f_1 \circ g = f_1 \circ g'$, then $f_1 \circ g' g^{-1} = f_1$. Since you've already noted the action is free, this foces $g'g^{-1} = I$, that is, $g' = g$.$\square$

We will also need the following lemma.

Lemma: Suppose $f_i$ is a sequence in $M$ and $f_i\rightarrow f$. Suppose $v_i$ is a sequence of vectors in $\mathbb{R}^k$ with $f_i v_i\rightarrow 0$. Then $v_i\rightarrow 0$.

Proof: Pick a background inner product on $V$ and use the usual inner product on $\mathbb{R}^k$. Write each $v_i\in \mathbb{R}^k$ in polar form: $v_i = r_i x_i$ with $x_i$ on the unit sphere $S^{k-1}$ in $\mathbb{R}^k$ and $r_i = |v_i|$. Let us assume that $v_i$ does not converge to $0$, which means there is an $\epsilon \geq 0$ with the property that $r_i \geq \epsilon$ for some infinite set of $i$s. Abusing notation, restrict to the subsequence of these $i$s and call the new sequence $v_i$.

Because $r_i f_i(x_i) = f_i(v_i)\rightarrow 0$ and $r_i$ does is bounded below, we must have $f_i(x_i)\rightarrow 0$. The $x_i$ all live on sphere, which is compact, so some subsequence (again called $x_i$) must converge to $x\in S{k-1}$. Then $f_i(x) = f_i(x-x_i) + f_i(x_i)$. Now, $\lim_{i\rightarrow\infty} f_i(x_i) = 0$ by hypothesis. Further, $\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty} f_i(x-x_i) = 0$. To see this, note that there is a universal bound $K$ for $\{f_i(v)|v\in S^{k-1}\}$ owing to the fact that $f_i\rightarrow f$. Then $|f_i(x-x_i)|\leq K|x-x_i|\rightarrow 0$ as $i\rightarrow \infty$.

In short, $\lim_{i\rightarrow\infty} f_i(x) = 0$. It now follows that $f(x) = 0$, which is a contradiciton because $f$ is injective and $x\in S^{k-1}$ so $x\neq 0$. $\square$

Now, let's show the action is proper. So, let $f_i$ and $g_i$ be sequences in $M$ and $G$ and assume that both $f_i\rightarrow f\in M$ and $h_i:=g_i\cdot f_i\rightarrow h\in N$. We must show that some subsequence of the $g_i$ converges in $G$.

By the above proposition, the image of $f_i$ is the same as the image of $h_i$. Again by the proposition, it follows that the image of $f$ and $h$ coincide, so there is a unique $g\in G$ with $h = f\circ g$.

We claim there is a subsequence of $g_i$ converging to $g$. To that end, let us suppose for a contradiction that there is a neighborhood of $g$ which contains none of the $g_i$. Thus, there is some $\epsilon > 0$ with the property that the matrix $g - g_i$ has at least one entry with is $\geq \epsilon$. As there are only a finite number ($k^2$) of entries of a matrix in $Gl(k)$, there is at least one entry (say, in row $a$, column $b$), for which a subsequence of the $g_i$s (for which I'll abuse notation and call the subsequence $g_i$) satisfy $|(g-g_i)_{ab}|\geq \epsilon$.

Now, we know that $f_i \circ g_i \rightarrow f\circ g$. So, $(f\circ g - f_i \circ g_i)(v)\rightarrow 0$ for any $v\in \mathbb{R}^k$. Now, $$f\circ g - f_i \circ g_i = f\circ g - f_i\circ g + f_i\circ g - f_i\circ g_i = (f-f_i)\circ g + f_i\circ (g- g_i)$$ and $f_i\rightarrow f$. This implies that $(f-f_i)(g v)\rightarrow 0$ for any $v\in \mathbb{R}^k$. This, now, implies that $f_i\circ (g- g_i)(v)\rightarrow 0$ for any $v\in \mathbb{R}^k.$

However, let $v = e_a$ and set $w_i = (g-g_i)(e_a)\in \mathbb{R}^k$. Then $|w_i|\geq \epsilon$ for every $i$, because the $b$-th entry of $w_i$ is, in absolute value, larger than or equal to $\epsilon$. On the other hand, $f_i(w_i)\rightarrow 0$. By the lemma, this implies $w_i\rightarrow 0$, which contradicts the fact that $|w_i|\geq \epsilon$.

Having reached a contradiction, we conclude that every open set about $g$ contains a $g_i$, so there is a subsequence of the original $g_i$ sequence converging to $g$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm using the characterization of properness given by Jack Lee here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/987038/… He says it can be found in his textbook, but I long ago loaned my copy to a student and never got it back so I'm not sure where. $\endgroup$ Mar 28 '20 at 18:10
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for such a great in-depth answer! $\endgroup$ Mar 31 '20 at 10:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.