I am not understanding a proof in Cameron's Permutation Groups.

Theorem 4.1. let G be k-transitive, but not $S_k $, with k>1. Then a non-trivial normal subgroup N of G is (k-1)-transitive, except possibly when k=3, when N may be an elementary abelian 2-group.

The proof given in the book is by induction on k. The base case of k=2 is clear: 2-transitive groups are primitive, and primitive groups' normal subgroups are transitive. Now we assume the result holds for k-1 and endeavour to prove it for k. Choose some $\alpha \in \Omega$ (where $\Omega$ is the set G acts on). Then the stabiliser $N_\alpha$ of $\alpha$ in N is a normal subgroup of the (k-1)-transitive stabiliser $G_\alpha$ of $\alpha$ in G (by second isom. thm.).

Now the bit I struggle with: by the induction hypothesis, one of three possibilities occurs:

1) $N_\alpha$=1. Then N is regular, so N is an elementary abelian 2-group, and G is not 4-transitive.

I won't list the other two possibilities, because I just want an explanation for why G is not 4-transitive. A previous theorem showed that if G is k-transitive for $k\ge 3$ then a regular normal subgroup is an elementary abelian 2-group. But that theorem says nothing about G not being 4-transitive, and the proof of the theorem in question implies that the previous theorem shows this.

Why is G not 4-transitive?

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

It's because the automorphism group of an elementary abelian $2$-group $N$ of order $2^n$ with $n\ge 3$ acts 2-transitively but not 3-transitively on its non-identity elements. (When $n=2$, it does act 3-transitively, and that corresponds to the case when $k=4$ and $G=S_4$, which is excluded by the theorem statement.)

To see that, think of $N$ as a vector space over the field of order 2 (and use additive notation in $N$). Then any two distinct nonzero vectors are linearly independent, and so there is a linear map (i.e. an automorphism of the group $N$) that maps them to any other two such vectors.

However, when $n\ge 2$, if we let $x,y,z$ be linearly independent elements of $N$ then there is no linear map (i.e. no group automorphism of $N$) that maps $x \to x$, $y \to y$, and $z \to x+y$, so the automorphism group does not act 3-transitively. Hence $G$ is not 4-transitive.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.