3
$\begingroup$

Let $\{X_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ is a succession of indepedent random variables, such that for all $n\geq 1$, $\mathbb E(X_n) =0$ and $\mathbb E(|X_n|) = 1$,

Prove or disprove that $\mathbb P(\lim \inf_{n} X_n < 0) > 0.$

I tried to handle it like this

Let us consider the succession of events $A_n = \{X_n < 0\}$. Since $(X_n)_n$ are independent then $(A_n)_n$ and $A^c_n = \{X_n \geq 0\}$ are also indepedent events. We have \begin{align*} \mathbb P(\lim \inf_{n} X_n < 0) &= \mathbb P(\lim \inf_{n} A_n)\\ & = \mathbb P(A_n \, \text{ e.v.})\\ &= 1 - \mathbb P\big((A_n \, \text{ e.v.})^c\big)\\ &= 1 - \mathbb P(A_n^c \, \text{ i.o.}\big). \end{align*} On the other hand, we have \begin{align*} \mathbb P(A_n^c) &= \mathbb P(X_n \geq 0)\\ & = ... \end{align*}

Here some recall of the notations used and my intention is to use the second BorelCantelli lemma that also I recall it here

First let's recall some definitions. Let $(A_n)_n$ be a sequence of events, we define \begin{align*} A_{n} \text{ infinitely often (i.o.) } &\equiv\left\{\omega: \omega \text { is in infinitely many } A_{n}\right\}\equiv \limsup _{n} A_{n} \equiv \bigcap_{m}^{\infty} \bigcup_{n=m}^{\infty} A_{n} \end{align*}

Note that $$ \mathbb {I}_{A_{n} \,i.o. }=\lim_{n} \sup \mathbb{I}_{A_{n}} $$ Similarly, \begin{align*} A_{n}\text{ eventually (e.v.) } \equiv\left\{\omega: \omega \text { is in } A_{n} \text { for all large } n\right\} \equiv \liminf _{n} A_{n} \equiv \bigcup_{m} \bigcap_{n=m}^{\infty} A_{n}. \end{align*} Note that $$ \mathbb{I}_{A_{n} \,e.v.} =\liminf _{n} \mathbb{I}_{A_{n}} $$ Also we have $\left(A_{n} \text { e.v.}\right)^{c}=\left(A_{n}^{c} \text { i.o. }\right)$. Moreover recall the second Borel-Cantelli Lemma:

If the events $(A_n)_n$ are independent, then $\sum_{n} \mathbb{P}(A_{n})=\infty$ implies $\mathbb{P}(A_{n} \text{ i.o.})=1$

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What have you tried? $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '20 at 11:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please look to my update $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '20 at 11:02
  • $\begingroup$ I am not familiar with the notation $e.v.$, what do you mean by it? $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '20 at 11:14
  • $\begingroup$ ah sorry e.v. to note eventually and i.o. infinitely often. I will update with a recall of Second Borela-Cantelli Lemma $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '20 at 11:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am familiar with the notation 'i.o', but not with 'e.v'. $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '20 at 11:17
1
$\begingroup$

Design $X_n \in \{-b_n, 0, b_n\}$ for $n \in \{1, 2 ,3, ...\}$ to satisfy

(i) $X_n \neq 0$ finitely often (with prob 1);

(ii) $E[X_n]=0$ for all $n$;

(iii) $E[|X_n|]=1$ for all $n$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I am wondering how $\mathbb E[|X_n|] = 1$, I think it's $2/3$ since there is equiprobability between the realizations of $X_n$, meaning $\mathbb P[X_n=-b_n] = \mathbb P[X_n=0] = \mathbb P[X_n = b_n] = 1/3$. In this case $E[|X_n]| = 2/3$. $\endgroup$ Mar 25 '20 at 9:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Who said $P[X_n=-b_n]=P[X_n=0] = P[X_n=b_n]$? Surely not! You can never get $P[\{X_n \neq 0\} f.o.]=1$ that way. I mentioned "Design $X_n$" and so there are a few things left to design (such as the PMF). (And the specific $b_n$ values). I think the structure $X_n \in \{-b_n, 0, b_n\}$ should be suggestive enough to complete the steps. $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Mar 25 '20 at 16:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Anyway, even if $P[X_n=-b_n]=P[X_n=0]=P[X_n=b_n]=1/3$, you cannot claim $E[|X_n|]=2/3$ without specifying the value of $b_n$. You would only get $2/3$ in the special case when $b_n=1$ for all $n$. $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Mar 25 '20 at 16:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In your terminology, you want $$P[\{X_n=0\} \: \mbox{eventually}] = 1$$ where I believe you are using "$\{X_n=0\}$ eventually" to mean that "$X_n=0$ for all but a finite number of indices $n \in\{1, 2, 3, ...\}$." (This is equivalent to my condition (i) above). $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Mar 27 '20 at 17:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.