In Chern-Weil theory, we choose an arbitrary connection $\nabla$ on a complex vector bundle $E\rightarrow X$, obtain its curvature $F_\nabla$, and then we get Chern classes of $E$ from the curvature form. A priori it looks like these live in $H^*(X;\mathbb{C})$, but by an argument that I don't feel like I really understand, they're in the image of $H^*(X;\mathbb{Z})$, which is where they're usually considered to actually live. I've also recently been learning about the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, and I get the impression that whenever I see a arbitrary constants in geometry that end up having to live in $\mathbb{Z}$ I should ask myself whether the index theorem is lurking in there somewhere. Is there anything to this wild guess?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure how often anyone gets to make a comment like this, but... this question might actually be more suited for MO than math.SE. :-) $\endgroup$ – Jesse Madnick Apr 29 '11 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ I think Jesse is right. An expert's answer to your question could help other non-experts in understanding the Atiyah-Singer theorem, and such an answer would better serve and interest the MO readers than the M.SE ones. Atiyah-Singer is strong voodoo, after all. $\endgroup$ – Gunnar Þór Magnússon Apr 29 '11 at 22:24
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know, I think it would also be good to leave the question here for at least a while and see if anyone has a go at answering it. I would also be quite interested in the answer. If you do post it on MO, please link to it here. $\endgroup$ – Glen Wheeler Apr 30 '11 at 9:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Eric: Certainly there's the algebraic topology proof (or even definition, really) that these are $\mathbb{Z}$-classes, but I saw an analytic argument in one my of lectures the other day that had nothing to do with classifying spaces or normalization. I think it's really cool when the same story can be carried all the way through in two such distinct settings. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Mazel-Gee May 2 '11 at 17:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Eric: The case of line bundles is Proposition 4.4.12 in Huybrechts' book, which just chases through the Cech-de Rham complex. I think the proof in my class was different, but maybe it was essentially equivalent. I'll try to find someone who took notes that day... $\endgroup$ – Aaron Mazel-Gee May 5 '11 at 9:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.