In a recent question, we are asked to prove that a function $f\in L^1(\mathbb R)\cap C^1(\mathbb R)$ such that $f'\in L^1(\mathbb R)$ satisfies $$\tag{1} \lvert \hat{f}(\xi)\rvert\le \frac{C}{\sqrt{1+\xi^2}}, $$ for some constant $C>0$, where the Fourier transform is defined as $$ \hat{f}(\xi)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)e^{-ix\xi}\, dx.$$

Question. Can the condition $f'\in L^1(\mathbb R)$ be dropped?

I expect the answer to be negative. More precisely, I conjecture the following.

Conjecture. There exists $f\in L^1(\mathbb R)\cap C^1(\mathbb R)$ such that $\xi\hat{f}(\xi)$ is unbounded as $\xi\to \infty$. Such a function must satisfy $f'\notin L^1(\mathbb R)$.

The function $$ f(x):=\frac{e^{ix^2}}{1+x^2}$$ is a candidate for this conjecture, because $f'\notin L^1(\mathbb R)$. To establish whether $\xi\hat{f}(\xi)$ is unbounded, we would need to perform an asymptotic analysis, as $\xi\to \infty$, of the oscillatory integral $$\tag{2} \hat{f}(2\xi)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{i(x^2-2x\xi)}}{1+x^2}\, dx.$$ (The factor of $2$ in front of $\xi$ is just a cosmetic, that suggests to complete the square).

I don't know how to carry out this asymptotic analysis. Typically, this would be done via the principle of stationary phase; see Stein, Harmonic Analysis, Proposition 3 pag.334. However, here the phase term $x^2-2x\xi$ is not of the form $\xi\Phi(x)$, for some function $\Phi$.


This question seems to be strongly related. It treats functions with a discontinuity in the derivative, whereas here we have a continuous, but slowly decaying, derivative. However, the following observation reduces the case of the present question to the case of the linked one. Using that, up to irrelevant constants, $$ \mathcal{F}_{x\to \xi}[e^{-ix^2}]=e^{-i\xi^2},\qquad \mathcal{F}_{x\to \xi}\left[\frac{1}{1+x^2}\right]=e^{-\lvert \xi\rvert}, $$ we can rewrite (2) as the convolution integral $$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{i(\xi-\eta)^2-\lvert\eta\rvert}\, d\eta , $$ which equals $$ e^{i\xi^2}\mathcal{F}_{\eta\to \xi}\left[ e^{i\eta^2-\lvert\eta\rvert}\right](\xi).$$ We are thus in the position of asymptotically estimate the Fourier transform of a function with a single discontinuity in its first derivative. This is exactly what is done in the linked question.

  • $\begingroup$ Do you want to have $\xi \widehat{f}(\xi)$ unbounded or diverging to $\infty$? $\endgroup$ – sometempname Mar 29 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ @sometempname: Unbounded would be enough. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Mar 29 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ Then I think you can construct something like $$\frac{\sin^4(x)}{x^2} \cdot \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{\exp(2 i k x)}{\sqrt{k}} = \frac{\sin^4(x)}{x^2} \cdot \mathrm{Li}_\frac12 ( \exp(2 i x) ), $$ where the $\sin$ makes it $C^1$, and on the Fourier side it is a sequence of triangles (positive and negative) decaying like $1/\sqrt{\xi}$. $\endgroup$ – sometempname Mar 29 at 19:39
  • $\begingroup$ Btw, this specific construction doesn't actually work, but maybe it can be modified $\endgroup$ – sometempname Mar 29 at 21:04
  • $\begingroup$ @sometempname: That would be great. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Mar 29 at 21:42

In general you probably cannot say anything better than $\widehat{f}(\xi) \to 0$ as in the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma (even if $f$ is smooth), by density considerations. There's probably a much simpler construction, but here is a concrete example.

Let $\phi$ a positive smooth bump function supported on $\left[-\frac12,\frac12\right]$, so that $\int_{\mathbb{R}}\phi \, dx=1$, and so that $\widehat{\phi}$ is also non-negative (notice $\widehat{\phi}$ is actually a Schwartz function).

Also notice that $$\int_{\mathbb{R}}\left|\phi^{\prime}\left(x\right)\right|dx\ge\int_{-1/2}^{0}\phi^{\prime}\left(x\right)dx-\int_{0}^{1/2}\phi^{\prime}\left(x\right)dx=2\phi\left(0\right)>0.$$

Put $$\phi_{j}\left(x\right)=2^{j}\phi\left(2^{j}\left(x+j\right)\right),\quad j\in\mathbb{\mathbb{N}},$$ so that $$\int_{\mathbb{R}}\phi_{j}\left(x\right)dx =1,$$ $\phi_{j}$,$\phi_{j}^{\prime}$ have disjoint support, and $$\int_{\mathbb{R}}\left|\phi_{j}^{\prime}\left(x\right)\right|dx\ge2^{j+1}\phi\left(0\right).$$ Let $\left\{ a_{j}\right\}$ be a sequence of numbers, and take $$f\left(x\right)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a_{j}\phi_{j}\left(x\right),$$ so that $f\in L^{1}$ iff $\left\{ a_{j}\right\} \in L^{1}$, also notice that $$f^{\prime}\left(x\right)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a_{j}\phi_{j}^{\prime}\left(x\right),$$ is not in $L^{1}$, if for example $a_{j}=\frac{1}{j^{2}}$. Then $$\widehat{\phi_{j}}\left(\xi\right)=2^{j}\cdot2^{-j}\widehat{\phi}\left(\frac{\xi}{2^{j}}\right)\exp\left(-2\pi ij\xi\right)=\widehat{\phi}\left(\frac{\xi}{2^{j}}\right)\exp\left(-2\pi ij\xi\right),$$ and $$\widehat{f}\left(\xi\right)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a_{j}\exp\left(-2\pi ij\xi\right)\widehat{\phi}\left(\frac{\xi}{2^{j}}\right).$$

Notice $\widehat{\phi}\left(0\right)=\int\phi \,dx=1$, and we can assume that $\widehat{\phi}\left(\xi\right)\ge\frac12$ on some interval $\left[-b,b\right]$, with $b>0$. Then, for $\xi\in\mathbb{N}$ if we put $$k\left(\xi\right)=\left\lceil \log_{2}\left(\frac{\xi}{b}\right)\right\rceil,$$ we see that $$\widehat{f}\left(\xi\right)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a_{j}\widehat{\phi}\left(\frac{\xi}{2^{j}}\right)\ge\frac12\sum_{j\ge k\left(\xi\right)}a_{j},$$ with the choice $a_{j}=\frac{1}{j^{2}}$ we get $$\widehat{f}\left(\xi\right)\ge\frac{c}{k\left(\xi\right)}\ge\frac{c^{\prime}}{\log\left(\xi\right)},\qquad\xi\in\mathbb{N},\,\xi\ge2,$$ for some constants $c, c^\prime>0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Brilliant. Thank you. It may be that $O(\frac{1}{\log \xi})$ is a lower bound for the decay rate of any $L^1$ function. On this, there is an exercise on Grafakos "Classical Fourier analysis", it is 2.2.9 (c), pag.117 of the 3rd edition. I still have to completely understand this, though. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Mar 30 at 21:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.