3
$\begingroup$

Let $(M, \omega)$ be a symplectic manifold, so that $\omega$ is a non-degenerate 2-form. If $\dim M = 2n$ why does $\omega$ being non-degenerate imply that $\underbrace{\omega \wedge \ldots \wedge \omega}_{n \text{ times}}$ is non-vanishing?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Let $x$ be a point in $\rm M$. Then because $\omega$ is non degenerate at $x$, the antisymmetric matrix $\omega_x$ has full rank on the tangent space at $x$. Now $\omega \, \wedge\, ... \wedge \, \omega$ at $x$ is just $\det \omega_x$ which is not zero because $\omega_x$ has full rank.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry I'm a bit confused. We have that $\omega \wedge \ldots \wedge \omega$ at $x$ is an alternating multilinear map $T_x M \times \ldots T_x M \longrightarrow \mathbb R$. In what sense is this map just $\operatorname{det}\omega_x$ and how do I see it? $\endgroup$ – Paul Slevin Apr 11 '13 at 22:52
  • $\begingroup$ I can't make sense of this answer. What is the determinant $\det \omega_x$ of the $2$-form $\omega_x$? There is no way to define the determinant of a multilinear form on a vector space . $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Aug 18 '18 at 16:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.