The OEIS sequence A248049 is defined by

$$ a_n \!=\! \frac{(a_{n-1}\!+\!a_{n-2})(a_{n-2}\!+\!a_{n-3})}{a_{n-4}} \;\text{with }\; a_0\!=\!2, a_1\!=\!a_2\!=\!a_3\!=\!1.$$

is apparently an integer sequence but I have no proofs. I have numerical evidence using PARI/GP and Mathematica only. It is a real problem because its companion OEIS sequence A248048 has the same recursion with $\,a_0=-1, a_1=a_2=a_3=1\,$ but now $\,a_{144}\,$ has a denominator of $2$. There is a resemblance to the Somos-4 sequence but that probably won't help with an integrality proof.

I have some interesting unproven observations about its factorization algebraically and $p$-adically for a few small values of $p$, but nothing that would prove integrality. For example, if $\,x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3\,$ are indeterminates, and we use initial values of $$ a_0=x_0,\; a_1=x_1,\; a_2=x_2,\; a_3=x_3 \;\text{ and }\; x_4 := x_1+x_2,$$ with the same recursion, then $\,a_n\,$ has denominator a monomial in $\,x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4\,$ with exponents from OEIS sequence A023434. Since $\,x_0=x_4=2\,$ with the original sequence I can't prove that the numerator has enough powers of $2$ to compensate. Another example is that $\,a_{12n+k}\,$ is odd for $\,k=1,2,3\,$ and even for the other residue classes modulo $12$. I also have some further observations about its $2$-adic valuation behavior which I can't prove.

By the way, the sequence grows very fast. My best estimate is $\,\log(a_n) \approx 1.25255\, c^n\,$ where $\,c\,$ is the plastic constant OEIS sequence A060006. Note that $$x^4-x^3-x^2+1 = (x-1)(x^3-x-1) $$ and $\,c\,$ is the real root of the cubic factor.

Can anyone give a proof of integrality of A248049?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you have $p$-integrality for all $p$, then the (global) integrality follows. $\endgroup$
    – WhatsUp
    Mar 19, 2020 at 3:13
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Reminds me of Somos Sequence's. $\endgroup$
    – Vepir
    Mar 19, 2020 at 11:27
  • 23
    $\begingroup$ @Vepir Probably not surprising because the author of OEIS sequence A248049 is Michael Somos. $\endgroup$
    – user
    Mar 19, 2020 at 11:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Similar to math.stackexchange.com/questions/1905063/… (note: the proof is less than 100% verified and rather unsatisfactory in its brute-force component). $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2020 at 15:08
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @darijgrinberg Thanks for your helpful comment! The sequence $p_n$ you wrote (and several other similar sequences) was known to me early in 2013 eight years ago. A simpler recursion is $p_n p_{n-6}=(p_{n-1}+p_{n-5})p_{n-3}.$ I agree that proving integrality of this would imply integrality of A248049. Unfortunately, I did not have time then to explore all of the sequences I found and their interelations. Thanks for reminding me! $\endgroup$
    – Somos
    Jan 28, 2021 at 3:25

1 Answer 1


A proof of integrality can be based on elementary algebra and some fortunate observations. The Darij Grinberg comments reminded me of some of my work I did in 2013 and which I did not follow up on adequately.

Factorization of the $\,a_n\,$ sequence suggests the Ansatz

$$ a_n = p_n p_{n+1} p_{n+2} p_{n+3} $$

where $\,p_n\,$ is some sequence yet to be determined. The sequence $\,a_n\,$ is supposed to satisfy a recurrence. For example, we must have

$$ a_4a_0 = (a_1+a_2)(a_2+a_3). $$

Rewriting this equation in terms of $\,p\,$ and solving for $\,p_7\,$ gives the rational solution

$$ p_7 = \frac{(p_1 + p_5)(p_2 +p_6) p_3 p_4}{p_0 p_1 p_6}. $$

Rewrite this as a polynomial equation to get

$$ p_6p_0p_7p_1 = (p_1 + p_5)p_3(p_2 + p_6)p_4. $$

Now suppose that $\,p_n\,$ satisfies the recurrence

$$ p_n = p_{n-3}\frac{p_{n-1} + p_{n-5}}{p_{n-6}}. $$

Check that this recurrence satisfies the polynomial equation for $\,p_7.\,$

From the $\,p_n\,$ recurrences for $\,n=9\,$ and $\,n=6\,$ we have

$$ p_9p_3 = (p_4 + p_8)p_6 \quad \text{ and } \quad p_6p_0 = (p_1 + p_5)p_3. $$

Combine the two equations to simply get

$$ (p_0 + p_4 + p_8)p_6 = (p_1 + p_5 + p_9)p_3. $$

This implies that the number

$$ c := \frac{ p_0 + p_4 + p_8 }{p_3 p_4 p_5} = \frac{ p_1 + p_5 + p_9 }{p_4 p_5 p_6}$$

is constant and thus, the sequence $\,p_n\,$ satisfies the equation

$$ p_{n}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-8} = c\,p_{n-3}p_{n-4}p_{n-5}. $$

By the way, defining another constant

$$ s := \sqrt{(a_2+a_1)a_2a_0/(a_3a_1)} $$

implies the equation

$$ c = s\frac{(a_0+a_1+a_2)(a_1+a_2+a_3)}{a_0a_2(a_1+a_2)}, $$

or more symmetrically, this can be written as

$$ c = \frac{(a_0+a_1+a_2)(a_1+a_2+a_3)} {\sqrt{a_0a_1a_2a_3(a_1+a_2)}}. $$

Given values of $\,p_0\,$ and $\,p_1\,$ then $\,p_2 = s/p_0\,$ and $\,p_3 = a_0/(p_1s)\,$ while the two sequences are related by $\,p_n = p_{n-4}a_{n-3}/a_{n-4}.\,$

If the sequence terms $\,p_0, p_1,\dots, p_7\,$ are integers and the constant $\,c\,$ is an integer, then this implies that $\,p_n\,$ is an integer sequence, and also $\,a_n\,$ using the Ansatz. In our case, $\,c=6\,$ and the sequence $\,p_n\,$ begins $\,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,10,33,140,\dots.\,$ This sequence was known to me in 2013 but I do not think I connected it to A248049 at that time.

A simpler example of a sequence similar to $\,p\,$ is OEIS A064098 with $$ a_na_{n-3} = a_{n-1}^2 + a_{n-2}^2 $$ and now with a constant $$ c := \frac{a_n^2+a_{n+1}^2+a_{n+2}^2} {a_na_{n+1}a_{n+2}} $$ such that the sequence $\,a_n\,$ also satisfies $$ a_n + a_{n-3} = c\,a_{n-1}a_{n-2}. $$

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ For me, this is almost magic. In a positive way. $\endgroup$ Jan 31, 2021 at 2:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.