In my lecture notes there is this observation:

"Any collection $S$ whatsoever of subsets of the non-empty set $X$ can serve as sub-basis for a topology on $X$."

So, taking the set $X:=\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ and an arbitrary collection of subsets: $S:=\{ \{1,2\}, \{1,2,3\}, \{3,4\} \}$

Any topology on $X$ will include the element $X$ (by the definition of topology) and by the definition of sub-base, every element of the topology on $X$ is a union of a set of finite intersections of elements of $S$. However, no such union of finite intersections of elements of $S$ will give me $X$. So how can such a topology be constructed?

Thanks Tal

  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subbase $\endgroup$ – joriki Apr 11 '13 at 17:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Take the empty intersection $\bigcap_{A\in\emptyset}A$. This is defined as the underlying set. Intuitively, the more sets intersect, the smaller the resulting set becomes. So if you intersect not a single set, then you get just everything. So this definition makes sense. $\endgroup$ – Stefan Hamcke Apr 11 '13 at 17:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See the answers to this question. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Apr 11 '13 at 19:20

The intersection of a family of subsets $\{E_j: j\in J\}$ of some set $X$ is defined as $$\bigcap_{j\in J}E_j= \{x\in X: \forall j\in J\ \ x\in E_j \} \tag1$$ If the index set $J$ is empty, the condition $\forall j\in J \dots$ is vacuously true, and (1) simplifies to $$\bigcap_{j\in \varnothing}E_j= \{x\in X\} =X$$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.