0
$\begingroup$

I need to classify the series $a_n=2^n-n$ as either absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent or divergent. The answer says it is divergent and says to use the nth term test to show this. I.e. Show $a_{n+1}-a_n\geq 1$ for all $n$, and hence $\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty }a_n= +\infty $.

What I don't understand is, why have they used $a_{n+1}-a_n\geq 1$? Isn't the nth term test just testing for convergence by determining $\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty }a_n\neq 0$? Can someone please show me how this question is done, thanks.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ If $a_n$ converges to $x$, then $a_{n+1}-a_n$ converges to $x-x=0$. That's all you need to understand to see why they used this. And why it implies that $|sum a_n$ diverges. $\endgroup$
    – Julien
    Apr 10, 2013 at 11:23

4 Answers 4

2
$\begingroup$

A necessary condition for the convergence of a series $\displaystyle\sum_n a_n$ is $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=0$ but this is not a sufficient condition as shown in the divergent series $\displaystyle\sum_n \frac{1}{n}$, hence by contraposition if $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n\not=0$ then the series $\displaystyle\sum_n a_n$ is divergent.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a reason it is >=1, rather than >0? $\endgroup$
    – user71865
    Apr 10, 2013 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ @user71865 Yes, if we suppose that the sequence $(a_n)$ has a finite limit and by passing to the limit in this inequality $a_{n+1}-a_n\geq1$ we can find a contradiction which is not the case if $1$ is replaced by $0$ $\endgroup$
    – user63181
    Apr 10, 2013 at 11:26
1
$\begingroup$

The test you are referring to, says that if the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ converges then $a_n\xrightarrow[n\to\infty]{}0$.
Therefore if you show that $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n\neq0$ the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ cannot converges.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The answer to this question should be straight forward. Recall the property of convergence:

if $\displaystyle \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} a_n$ converges $\Rightarrow \displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_n=0$ (Remark, the converse is not true!,e.g. $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}$)

By contrapositive property in logic, it implies that:

$\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_n \not=0 \Rightarrow \displaystyle \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} a_n$ doesn't converges, hence it diverges.

There is no other higher technique required. It's just following the basic definition of series. Hope this helps you.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

As $n \to \infty$, $a_n\to \infty$. This means that, when you are adding new terms, the suma is getting bigger and bigger. So it's divergent.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.