0
$\begingroup$

I am currently studying for my upcoming algebra exam and I was wondering if anybody could explain to me this example of a very basic CRT question.

If $x=38$ then $x \equiv 2 \pmod{9}$ and $x \equiv 3 \pmod{7}$.

Solving this, I start by turning the first equation into $2+9y$ and then input it to $2+9y \equiv 3 \pmod 7$. However from here I don't understand why the example gives $2y \equiv 1 \pmod7 \rightarrow y \equiv 4 \pmod 7$ (I get how it went from that to $y \equiv 4 \pmod 7$).

I thought it would be $(2+9y-3)/7$ so $(9y-1)/7$ or is there a better way of getting the answer? Thanks!

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ As amWhy notes, what you've written is not even a question, it's just a true statement. Is it possible you have omitted or miswrote something? $\endgroup$ – anon Apr 9 '13 at 19:53
3
$\begingroup$

The claim:

if $x=38$ then $x≡2\pmod 9$ and $x≡3\pmod 7$

is merely telling you that

  • if $x = 38$, then when you divide $38$ by $9$, you get a remainder of $2$. And that's true: $\;38 \equiv 2 \pmod 9$: indeed $x = 38 = 9\cdot k + 2, \;\;\text{with}\;\; k = 4$.
  • If $x = 38$, then if you divide $x = 38$ by $7$, you get a remainder of 3. That's true to: $38 \equiv 3 \pmod 7. \;\;$ Indeed, $\;38 = 7\cdot k + 3,\;\;\text{with} \;\;k = 5$.

There's nothing to solve here. We already know $x$: it is given to be $38$.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Teaching and answering! +1 $\endgroup$ – Amzoti Apr 10 '13 at 0:38
  • $\begingroup$ I suspect there was more to the question that went unposted; but I did the best I could do with the information given... ;-) $\endgroup$ – Namaste Apr 10 '13 at 0:39
  • $\begingroup$ I sometimes think that they get it when they see the answer and then want to crawl under a rock - I have been there many times! :-) $\endgroup$ – Amzoti Apr 10 '13 at 0:41
  • $\begingroup$ @amWhy:You are asleep now, my dear friend, Amy. $\endgroup$ – mrs Apr 10 '13 at 5:58
0
$\begingroup$

Hint $\rm\,\ mod\ 7\!:\ 3 \equiv x\equiv 2+9y\equiv 2+2y\:\Rightarrow\:2y\equiv 1\equiv 8,\:$ so $\rm\:y \equiv 4,\:$ i.e. $\rm\: y = 4 + 7k,\:$ therefore, substituting for $\rm\,y,\:$ $\rm\:x = 2+9y = 2+9(4+7k) = 38+63k.$

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I presume you are trying to solve the opposite direction, based on the work you show. $\endgroup$ – Math Gems Apr 10 '13 at 2:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.