4
$\begingroup$

In my intro differential equations class we have often used the "equivalence" stated in title. It seems to me that somehow, the intermediate step $$ \frac{dx}{f(x)} = g(y)dy$$ is being used, in which case $dx$ and $dy$ are being used as numbers from a fraction! The equivalence is intuitively clear to me, but I would like to know what the justification for this informal process is. How would one give rigor to this equivalence?

To be clear, I am looking for a formal treatment as well as some motivation as to why we can work with $dx$'s in this manner.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I don't truly understand hyperreal numbers and how to manipulate them formally, but I think this might be a start Wiki- hyperreal numbers $\endgroup$ – Kevin Driscoll Apr 9 '13 at 2:21
  • $\begingroup$ @KevinDriscoll : very interesting, I will look into that... $\endgroup$ – Coffee_Table Apr 9 '13 at 2:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think try interpret this into $\delta-\epsilon$ language will work. $\endgroup$ – Easy Apr 9 '13 at 2:53
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm. Well, such a quantity has meaning in differential geometry. For the intro class, it's just a technique to solve. By uniqueness (sometimes), it doesn't matter $\textit{how}$ you got the solution. $\endgroup$ – Euler....IS_ALIVE Apr 9 '13 at 2:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Euler....IS_ALIVE : yes, but I personally would like to know. $\endgroup$ – Coffee_Table Apr 9 '13 at 3:14
8
$\begingroup$

I talk about this as integration by substitution to avoid talking about differentials.

Take \begin{equation} \frac{dy}{dx} = f(y)g(x) \implies \frac{1}{f(y)} \frac{dy}{dx} = g(x) \end{equation} then we integrate over $x$

\begin{equation} \int \frac{1}{f(y)} \frac{dy}{dx} dx= \int g(x)dx. \end{equation} Since we're thinking of $y$ as a function of $x$, we 'integrate by substitution' or perform '$u$-substitution'.

\begin{equation} \int \frac{1}{f(y(x))} \frac{dy}{dx} dx= \int\frac{dy}{f(y)}. \end{equation}

This is simply the integral equivalent of the chain rule.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ very clear, but its still funny how using the $dy/dx$ as a fraction somehow works out! $\endgroup$ – Coffee_Table Apr 9 '13 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ It's one of those amazing things in mathematics that seem so intuitive but hint at a deeper structure. It's the sort of thing that spurred me to learn more. $\endgroup$ – MrSlunk Apr 10 '13 at 2:20
1
$\begingroup$

$\frac{dx}{dy}=f(x)g(y)\Leftrightarrow\Delta x=f(x)g(y)\Delta y+o(\Delta y)\Leftrightarrow\frac{\Delta x}{f(x)}=g(y)\Delta y+\frac{o(\Delta y)}{f(x)}\Leftrightarrow\lim_{\Delta x\rightarrow0}\sum\frac{\Delta x}{f(x)}=\lim_{\Delta y\rightarrow0}\sum(g(y)\Delta y+\frac{o(\Delta y)}{f(x)})=\lim_{\Delta y\rightarrow0}\sum g(y)\Delta y\Leftrightarrow\int\frac{dx}{f(x)}=\int g(y)dx$

Note: $\Delta x=(x+\Delta x)-x$ is the infinitesimal variation at the point $x$; $o(\Delta x)$ is a function which satisfies $\lim_{\Delta x\rightarrow0}\frac{o(\Delta x)}{\Delta x}=0$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ could you please define $\Delta x$ and $o(\Delta x)$ ? $\endgroup$ – Coffee_Table Apr 9 '13 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Coffee_Table, check out my definition. Note that the first equivalence comes from the definition of limit, and $\Delta x$ and $\Delta y$ simultaneously goes to $0$ is due to the continuity of the function. $\endgroup$ – Easy Apr 9 '13 at 3:26
  • $\begingroup$ "$\Delta x=(x+\Delta x)-x$" - the quantity is defined in terms of itself? perhaps you means $\Delta x=(x+h)-x$ where $h$ goes to $0$ ? $\endgroup$ – Coffee_Table Apr 9 '13 at 3:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Coffee_Table, it is ok if you feel comfortable about the second way of definition. In fact they are the same as $\Delta x=h$. $\endgroup$ – Easy Apr 9 '13 at 6:07
1
$\begingroup$

Since one of the tags attached to this question is "infinitesimals", I thought I would elaborate on MrSlunk's comment above: "It's one of those amazing things in mathematics that seem so intuitive but hint at a deeper structure". To clarify the structure involved, note that in the context of a hyperreal extension of the reals one can indeed represent the derivative as the ratio of infinitesimals $dy$ over $dx$. Then the relation $\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x)g(y)$ can literally be rewritten as $\frac{dx}{f(x)}=g(y)dy$, and then integrated to produce the result. This treatment appears in Keisler's "Elementary calculus" on pages 464-465, see http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html, and retroactively justifies the expression "separation of variables".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.