In an old exam appeared this statement:
True/False: "Let $R$ be a ring with the property that the unique ring automorphism is the identity. Then the set of all nilpotent elements form an ideal".
I've seen in Nilpotent elements of a non-commutative ring with trivial automorphism group form an ideal that the result is valid when the ring has multiplicative identity. I want to know if the result is true even omitting the hypothesis of the ring having 1. Some intuition tells me that, as the examples of non-commutative rings with trivial automorphism group are hard to construct (see for example Is there a non-commutative ring with a trivial automorphism group?), the result should be true because it is an exam question.
A way of thinking to solve the exercise was to embed $R$ via $r\mapsto (r,0)$ in the ring $R\times \mathbb{Z}$ as in Hungerford Theorem III 1.10. The ring $R\times \mathbb{Z}$ has the usual sum but the product is $$(r_1,n_1)(r_2,n_2)=(r_1r_2+n_2r_1+n_1r_2, n_1 n_2).$$
Now I would like to show that $R\times\mathbb{Z}$ has only the trivial automorphism, because the nilpotent elements of $R\times\mathbb{Z}$ are on the copy of $R\times\{0\}$ so I may use the result in $R\times\mathbb{Z}$ which has 1.
Can you help me to finish or provide me a counterexample if this is false? Thank you