Let $\{(X_k, \mathcal{X}_k) : k \in K \}$ be a nonempty family of measurable spaces. In my measure theory class, we defined $\otimes_{k \in K}\mathcal{X}_k$ (product of $\sigma$-algebras) to be the smallest $\sigma$-algebra for which all the projections $\pi_k$ are measurable.

So, does this mean that combining measurable and unmeasurable sets gives you a measurable set? To be precise, let's say we are on $(\mathbb{R}^2 , \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) \otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}))$. Is $V \times [0, 1]$ measurable in $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) \otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$, where V is the Vitali set (or any other $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ - unmeasurable set)?

$\pi_2(V \times [0, 1]) = [0,1]$, and $\pi_2$ is measurable on product $\sigma$-algebra... so the answer should be yes? Or am I making a mistake? Or $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) \otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ isn't equal with $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^2)$?


That $\pi_2$ is measurable with respect to $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ means that $$ \pi_2^{-1}(A)\in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\quad A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) $$ but not that if $B\subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ is a set such that $\pi_2(B)\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$, then $B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$. Note that in your example $\pi_2^{-1}([0,1])=\mathbb{R}\times [0,1]$.

For example, consider the constant function $f:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$ given by $f(x,y)=0$. This is clearly measurable with respect to any sigma-algebra you may put on $\mathbb{R}^2$, but for any non-measurable set $B\subseteq\mathbb{R}^2$ you have $f(B)=\{0\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.