4
$\begingroup$

There are mathematical symbols to represent angles ($\angle AB$) and magnitudes ($|AB|$) and what not (ie: not variables, but rather symbol operator thingies).

Is there a symbol to represent the area of a given shape?
(so for a shape defined by points $A,B,C,D$; I could represent the area as *symbol* $ABCD$ or something to that effect)

I'm not looking for a variable to contain the area, like $A$, but a representation for a given shape.

Thanks!
(Sorry if this question is out of place; new here)
(was also uncertain about tag)

| cite | improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Whatever notation you use, define it, and everything should be fine. To get you some ideas, you could use, for example:

  • $[\triangle ABC]$, $[\hspace{-1pt}[\triangle ABC ]\hspace{-1pt}]$,
  • $\langle \triangle ABC \rangle$, $\langle\!\langle \triangle ABC \rangle\!\rangle$,
  • $|\triangle ABC|$, $\|\triangle ABC\|$,
  • $\mu_2(\triangle ABC)$.

If you won't use other measures like lenght or volume, you can skip the "2" symbol or the double brackets.

I hope this helps ;-)

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The Lebesgue measure seems like what your'e looking for. It is a generalization of the well-known length, area and volume.

For the area of the shape ABCD, you could write $m(ABCD)$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It seems fairly general. Should one declare the specific meaning (eg: n = 2) or is that implied from the argument of m (ABCD seemingly representing a surface)? $\endgroup$ – Anti Earth Apr 7 '13 at 9:49
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ ... or $\mu$ or $\lambda$ instead of $m$. And then one would expect $ABCD$ to denote the set we want to find the area of. So there's a bit of abuse of notation involved. In other words, there's not really a standard notation as such. You'd better introduce any notation and symbol you want to use for this purpose in your texts ... $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Apr 7 '13 at 9:50
  • $\begingroup$ If you want to talk about two dimensional shapes in the plane, you should say "the two-dimensional Lebesgue measure". $\endgroup$ – user1337 Apr 7 '13 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.