Consider $\mathcal{R}^{\infty}$, and linear map $\mathcal{L} \in L(\mathcal{R}^{\infty})$, where $\mathcal{L}((x_1,x_2,...))=(x_2,x_3,...)$. Now, any number $\lambda \in \mathcal{R}$ is an eigenvalue with eigenvector $(c,c\lambda,c \lambda^2,...)$. But dimention of $\mathcal{R}^{\infty}$ is countable. Is this a problem?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AndrewOstergaard: Not mine the downvote, but I suppose that it is motivated by some confusion in your answer between a Hamel basis ( that in this case is not countable) and a Schauder basis as your $e_1,e_2,...,e_n,...$. See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/630142/… $\endgroup$ – Emilio Novati Feb 1 at 21:57

As noted in my comment, here, the main concept, is that of basis of a vector space and, as a consequence, the concept of dimension.( see the link in the comment)

A basis of a vector space (called a Hamel basis) is a set of linearly independent vectors such that any vector can be expressed as a linear combination of elements of the basis. But note that a linear combination is a finite sum of products of scalars and vectors. So, in your case the set of vectors $E=\{(1,0,0,\cdots),(0,1,0,0\cdots),(0,0,1,0,0\cdots)\}$ is not a basis, because we cannot express all sequences as a finite linear combination of those sequences.

So it is wrong that the dimension of $\mathbb{R}^\infty $ is conuntable. And we can have an uncountable set of linearly independent eigenvectors.

If we think at $\mathbb{R}^\infty $ as a normed vector space than the set $E $ is a Schauder basis (and any vector can be expressed as an ''infinite linear combination''of elements of $E$) , but the vector dimension of the space remains uncountable infinite.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.