0
$\begingroup$

The definition of an adapted process $X$ is that $X_i$ be $(\mathcal{F_i}, \Sigma)$-measuriable where $\mathcal{F.} = (\mathcal{F_i})_{i \in S}$ is a filtration of the sigma algebra $\mathcal{F}$ (probability space) and $\Sigma$ is part of the measurable space $(S, \Sigma)$. (and there are other required ones, but I will skip those parts.)

And predictable processes are the ones that $X_t$ is measurable with respect to $F_{t-}$.

It seems that adapted left-continuous processes cannot be predictable processes - after all, if they are adapated, $X_t$ must be $F_t$ measurable, while the definition of predictable processes say that $X_t$ must be $F_{t-}$-measurable.

Why are these seemingly nonsenses working?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ?? Adapted: $X_t$ $F_t$-measurable. Predictable: $X_t$ $F_{t-}$-measurable. Hence predictable $\implies$ adapted but not the other way round. Does this answer your post (which I am not sure to understand)? $\endgroup$ – Did Apr 6 '13 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Did Maybe I am confusing concepts. So, being adapted process is usually said informally as "one cannot see into future." Being $\mathcal{F_t-}$-measurable seems to look like "being able to see into future"... Anyway, so being $\mathcal{F_t}$-measurable includes cases where it is $\mathcal{F_s}$-measurable where $s<t$. (to rephrase, the whole thing means that if it is $\mathcal{F_s}$-measurable, then it is $\mathcal{F_t}$-measurable, where $s<t$, right?) $\endgroup$ – Zeus Apr 6 '13 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ Let me suggest to drop (at least for a moment) this talk about "seeing into the future" and the like. Better to stick to the definitions before paraphrasing them. Now: adapted + left-continuous $\implies$ predictable. $\endgroup$ – Did Apr 6 '13 at 14:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Zeus The title of your question is rather confusing, perhaps you could choose a more appropriate one. $\endgroup$ – saz Apr 7 '13 at 8:28
4
$\begingroup$

If $X_t$ is $\mathcal{F}_t$-measurable, this does not imply that $X_t$ is not $\mathcal{F}_{t-}$-measurable. Actually, left-continuous adapted processes are predictable:

Let $t \geq 0$. The information about the path $[0,t) \ni s \mapsto X(s,\omega)$ already determines the value at time $t$, since $$X(t,\omega) = \lim_{s \uparrow t} X(s,\omega)$$ by the left-continuity of $X$. This means (intuitively) that you can predict $X_t$ by the knowledge of $(X_s)_{s <t}$. Since $X_s$ is $\mathcal{F}_{t-}$-measurable for all $s<t$, this implies the $\mathcal{F}_{t-}$-measurability of $X_t$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The "Intuition" step seems like a full proof, quite rigorous. $\endgroup$ – Did Apr 6 '13 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Did ... so I removed the "intuition" (and shortened the proof). $\endgroup$ – saz Apr 6 '13 at 16:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.