1
$\begingroup$

My question refers to a discussion from this older thread on Neron-Severi group of a Kähler manifold. In the comments below Ted Shifrin's answer there arised a discussion when the map $H^2(X,\mathbb{Z}) \to H^2(X,\mathbb{C})$ indced by the canonical inclusion $\mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{C}$ may be not injective. As Ted pointed out the main reason that prevents this map beeing injective is the presence torsion in $H^2(X,\mathbb{Z})$.

Then he continues "From the line bundle side, you can see this with flat bundles (whose curvature forms vanish, and so the De Rham representative is the zero form)."

Unfortunatelly I not understand how his example & argument for line bundles by considering to flat bundles work. Definitely, as the curvature forms of flat bundles vanish, their De Rham representative in $H^2(X,\mathbb{C})$ is zero. That's fine.

Why is it an example for torsion elements in $H^2(X,\mathbb{Z})$? Does their De Rham representative not already vanish in $H^2(X,\mathbb{Z})$ as the curvature is zero? But then it not provide an example for a torsion element.

Or do I miss Ted's point?

Could anybody explain the argument?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.