0
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have a contraction (or non-expansive) matrix $U \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$, which satisfies $\left\lVert U \right\rVert_2 \leq 1$.

Given some matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ can one say that the spectral radius of the product $AU$, denoted $\rho(AU)$, is less than the spectral radius of $A$? i.e., can you conclude $$\rho(AU) \leq \rho(A)$$

I know that if the matrices commute, you can say that $\rho(AU) \leq \rho(A)\rho(U) \leq \rho(A)$. But I'm interested in the case where these matrices don't necessarily commute.

I think that the spectral radius is the infimum over subordinate matrix norms (which I think are sub-multiplicative right?), (see, e.g., How to prove that the spectral radius of a linear operator is the infimum over all subordinate norms of the corresponding norm of the operator.). So along those lines $$ \rho(AU) = \inf_{\left\lVert \cdot \right\rVert} \left\lVert AU \right\rVert $$ Just suppose for a second that the infimum is achieved and let $\left\lVert U \right\rVert_{M}$ denote the norm. Using sub-multiplicativity of the subordinate norm, maybe you can pull out the $U$ and say something like $$ \left\lVert U \right\rVert_{M} \leq \left\lVert U \right\rVert_{2} \leq 1. $$ I know that all matrix norms are equivalent within a constant, but in this case, we would need to say that the constant is less than or equal to $1$. Also, what if you can't exactly pin down that norm $\left\lVert U \right\rVert_{M}$?

Does assuming that $U$ is a unitary matrix give you anything extra that you can leverage? For example, what if $U$ had the following block form $$ \begin{pmatrix} U_1 & 0 \\ 0 & U_2 \end{pmatrix} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}, $$ where $U_1$ and $U_2$ are unitary matrices.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Is suspect that you could probably say something like this in the case that $A$ is positive semidefinite. $\endgroup$ Jan 17 '20 at 10:04
2
$\begingroup$

The answer is no. As an example, consider $$ U = \epsilon \pmatrix{0 & 1\\1 & 0}, \qquad A = \pmatrix{0&1\\0&0} $$ where $\epsilon$ satisfies $0 < \epsilon \leq 1$. Then $U$ is contractive, but $\rho(AU) = \epsilon > 0 = \rho(A)$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I don't want to read too much into your example, but to "fix things," if $A$ and $B$ have full rank and each have $\rho(A) < 1$ and $\rho(B)<1$, do you think you can say $\rho(AB) \leq \max\{\rho(A)^2, \rho(B)^2\}$? Or is there an obvious counter example here? Of course for symmetric matrices this holds, but what about non-symmetric matrices? $\endgroup$
    – Mido
    Jan 20 '20 at 2:30
  • $\begingroup$ Your fix is not quite enough. Try adding $\alpha I$ to $A$ for a sufficiently small $\alpha > 0$. $\endgroup$ Jan 20 '20 at 7:14
  • $\begingroup$ Ah yes. So for example, if you set $\alpha=1/2$ it works, but if you take $\alpha$ small enough, then $\rho(AU)$ is still pretty much equal to $\epsilon$ which is larger than $\epsilon^2$. $\endgroup$
    – Mido
    Jan 20 '20 at 18:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.