Construction of gluing sheaves as an equaliser I'm reading Theorem 2.9.1 of 
this notes about glueing sheaves which uses a categorical argument. 

Question: In (iii) below it's stated that there is an isomorphism
$F_i(U_i\times _X V)\cong  \underset{\leftarrow}{\operatorname{lim}}_{W\in \tau} F_i(U_i\times_X W)$ where I assume $\tau$ is a covering of $V$.  How the limit diagram is constructed here? Does this limit contain the same information as the equaliser diagram in the definition of sheaves?

 A: The answer is yes, basically because all limit diagrams can actually be written as an equalizer of products. 
Here $\mathcal T$ seems to be a typo for $\mathcal V$ which is a covering of $V$ assumed to be stable under fiber products. Then I claim that the limit of $F_i(U_i\times_X W)$ over $\mathcal V$ is the usual thing, that is : the equalizer of $\prod_{W\in \mathcal V}F_i(U_i\times_X W) \rightrightarrows \prod_{W,W'\in \mathcal V}F_i(U_i\times_X (W\times_V W'))$ where the two maps are the same as usual. 
If this is correct, then the fact that the limit is $F_i(U_i\times_X V)$ is just the statement that $F_i$ is a sheaf and that $U_i\times_X W$ is a covering of $U_i\times_X V$ and that $U_i\times_X (W\times_V W') = (U_i\times_X W)\times_{U_i\times_X V} (U_i\times_X W')$ (which follows from some simple diagram chase)
Now the proof. Suppose you have a cone $(Y,f_W)$ over the $F_i(U_i\times_X W), W\in\mathcal V$. Then clearly the product map $Y\to \prod_{W\in \mathcal V}F_i(U_i\times_X W)$ with coordinates the $f_W$ equalizes the two maps of the above equalizer, as $W\times_V W' \in \mathcal V$.
So we get a unique map $Y\to$ the equalizer. 
So it suffices to show that the projections of the equalizer form a cone. But suppose you have a map $W\to W'$ in $\mathcal V$, that is, an inclusion $W\subset W'$. Then $W'\times_V W = W$ so that clearly the two maps are equalized by the equalizer : it does form a cocone. 
So we are done 
(I treated the case of a space, but of course if there is a map $W\to W'$ in $\mathcal V$, then it's a map above $V$, so that $W\times_V W'$ is still canonically identified with $W$, so it doesn't change much)
