0
$\begingroup$

Let's say I have a DE of the form:

$$a y''(t) + b y'(t) + c y(t) = A \cos(\omega t)$$

The homogeneous DE has complex conjugate roots, so the system oscillates without the presences of a forcing function: $A \cos(\omega t)$

Let's say I remove the forcing function $A \cos(\omega t)$ from the DE by setting RHS to zero, and i'm left with a homogenous DE equation:

$$a y''(t) + b y'(t) + c y(t) = 0$$

Then, the solution would of this system is the zero input response of the system, and the frequency of oscillation system of this undriven system is called the natural response $\omega_0$ of the system.

QUESTION: Is it always the case that the resonate frequency of the inhomogenous DE with a forcing function:

$$a y''(t) + b y'(t) + c y(t) = A \cos(\omega t)$$

is equal to the natural response frequency $\omega_0$ of the undriven system?

By resonant frequency, I mean the value of $\omega$ that I can select a value such that the forcing function $A \cos(\omega t)$ will produce a y(t) output the has the largest average peak amplitude for the inhomogenous system equation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ intuitively, for the total solution, $y(t) = y_h(t) + y_p(t)$, it seems like if $\omega$ is set to the natural frequency $\omega_0$ then the homogeneous solution and particular solution add together to generate the largest peak amplitude... except, i can't really assume that the particular solution is in phase with the homogeneous solution..so maybe they don't add together constructively... $\endgroup$ – pico Jan 16 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ the case of the LC circuit: $LCy'' + y = A \cos(\omega t)$ ... has a total solution of: $y = K \cos(\frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}t + \phi) + \frac{A}{1 - LC\omega^2} \cos(\omega t)$... where the natural frequency is: $\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}$... rearranging, $y = \cos(\omega_0 t + \phi) + LC \bigg(\frac{A}{\omega_0^2 - \omega^2}\bigg) \cos(\omega t)$... in this case, natural frequency = resonate frequency....becuse $y = \infty$ when $\omega = \omega_0$ ... I don't know what makes this case special though... you say damping coefficient in characteristic equation... not sure... $\endgroup$ – pico Jan 16 at 16:19
1
$\begingroup$

Using complex numbers, the admittance (inverse of the transmittance) of the system is

$$-a\omega^2+ib\omega+c$$ and its squared modulus is

$$(c-a\omega^2)^2+(b\omega)^2.$$

It has a minimum at

$$\omega_r=\frac{\sqrt{4ac-\color{red}2b^2}}{2a}$$ which is the resonant pulsation.

By contrast, the natural pulsation is the imaginary part of the roots of $az^2+bz+c$, or

$$\omega_0=\frac{\sqrt{4ac-b^2}}{2a}.$$

As you see, these two puslations are not identical, and this is due to the damping term.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ which one is the damping term? $\endgroup$ – pico Jan 16 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ what damping value would give you natural freq = resonate freq? $\endgroup$ – pico Jan 16 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ @pico: no damping. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Jan 16 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @pico The damping term is $b$. $\endgroup$ – Milo Brandt Jan 16 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ if b = 0, then natural frequency = resonate frequency? $\endgroup$ – pico Jan 16 at 16:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.