If two elliptic curves share the same j-invariant then they may not be isomorphic to each other over $\mathbb{Q}$.


$E_1: y^2 = x^3 + x$

j-inavriat: $1728$

Torsion points: $[(0 : 0 : 1), (0 : 1 : 0)]$

Rank $0$.

$ $

$E_2: y^2 = x^3 + 3 x$

j-inavriat: $1728$

Torsion points: $[(0 : 0 : 1), (0 : 1 : 0)]$

Rank $1$ - generator point $[(1 : 2 : 1)]$

Is there some other invariant or can we define a new type of invariant that if two elliptic curves share the same such invariant then they are isomorphic over $\mathbb{Q}$?

(they can be birationally transformed to each other over $\mathbb{Q}$)


2 Answers 2


You really don't need to use $L$-functions or representations. Let's work over a field $K$ of characteristic not equal to 2 or 3, so for example $K=\mathbb Q$. Then an elliptic curve $E/K$ always has a Weierstrass model $$ E:y^2=x^3+Ax+B, $$ but the model is not unique. The $j$-invariant $$ j(E) = 1728\cdot\frac{4A^3}{4A^3+27B^2} $$ classifies $E$ up to $\overline K$ isomorphism. You're interested in $K$-isomorphism. Assuming that $j(E)\ne0$ and $j(E)\ne1728$ (i.e., assume that $AB\ne0$), define a new invariant $$ \gamma(E) = B/A \bmod{{K^*}^2} \in K^*/{K^*}^2. $$ One can check that $\gamma(E)$ is well-defined modulo squares in $K$. Then $$ \text{$E\cong E'$ over $K$} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \text{$j(E)=j(E')$ and $\gamma(E)=\gamma(E')$.} $$ If $j(E)=0$, then $A=0$ and there's a similar criterion in terms of $B$ modulo ${K^*}^6$, and if $j(E)=1728$, then $B=0$ and there's a criterion in terms of $A$ modulo ${K^*}^4$.

However, probably the right way to understand this is to use the fact that for a given $E/K$, the collection of $E'/K$ that are $\overline{K}$-isomorphic to $E$ are classified by the cohomology group $$ H^1\bigl(\operatorname{Gal}(\overline K/K),\operatorname{Aut}(E)\bigr). $$ The three cases correspond to $\operatorname{Aut}(E)$ being $\mu_2$, $\mu_6$, and $\mu_4$, respectively, and one knows (Hilbert Theorem 90) that $$ H^1\bigl(\operatorname{Gal}(\overline K/K),\mu_n\bigr)\cong K^*/{K^*}^n. $$ This unifies the three cases, and gives a quite general way to describe the $\overline{K}/K$-twists of an algebraic variety.

  • $\begingroup$ Does all of this work over fields that are not perfect? $\endgroup$
    – Guenterino
    Jun 6, 2021 at 7:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Guenterino For characteristic not equal to 2 or 3, the first part of my answer should work verbatim. For non-perfect fields, the second part of my answer clearly would need to be modified. It should work to give a description of "separable twists". But I'm not sure offhand what happens for "inseparable twists" (if that's even the right term for it) in characteristics 2 and 3 if $K$ is not perfect. I don't work with that situation myself, but I expect there are people who know the answer. You could try asking as a new question here, and if you don't get an answer, then try MathOverflow. $\endgroup$ Jun 6, 2021 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. I have created a new thread (math.stackexchange.com/questions/4165089/…) as you suggested. $\endgroup$
    – Guenterino
    Jun 6, 2021 at 16:14

Since Silverman answered consider this as a comment, showing that it is a good thing to experiment with quadratic twists

  • Given an elliptic curve $E/\Bbb{Q}$ we get an homomorphism $$\rho_E: Gal(\overline{\Bbb{Q}}/\Bbb{Q})\to Aut(E_{tors})$$

    If $E$ is isomorphic to $E'$ over $\Bbb{Q}$ then $\rho_{E'}= f \circ \rho_E \circ f^{-1}$

  • With $E:y^2=x^3+ax+b$, $E_d : dy^2=x^3+ax+b$, $f(x,y)=(x,y/\sqrt{d})$ we get $$\rho_{E_d}(\sigma)= [\chi_d(\sigma)]\circ f \circ \rho_E(\sigma) \circ f^{-1}$$ where $\chi_d(\sigma) = \frac{\sigma(\sqrt{d})}{\sqrt{d}}=\pm 1$ and $[-1](x,y)=(x,-y)$ commutes with $f,\rho_E$.

Thus $E\cong E_d$ over $\Bbb{Q}$ iff $d\in (\Bbb{Q}^*)^2$

And the so called quadratic twists $E_d,d\in \Bbb{Q}^*/(\Bbb{Q}^*)^2$ are infinitely many pairwise distinct $\Bbb{Q}$-isomorphism classes of elliptic curves, they become isomorphic only over $\Bbb{Q}( \{ \sqrt{p}\})$.

This suggests that (in most cases...) a sufficient data determining the $\Bbb{Q}$-isomorphism class is the $j$-invariant plus the Galois module or the L-function.

  • $\begingroup$ So nothing simpler than L-function is needed for general cases. But for some special cases like yours $E$ and $E_d$ there may be a simpler method of determining when they are $\Bbb{Q}$-isomorphic. $\endgroup$ Jan 12, 2020 at 12:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.