1
$\begingroup$

I know that if we have a filtered probability space $(\Omega, \mathscr{F},\{ \mathscr{F}_t \},P)$ and we have a probability measure Q equivalent to P, then there exists the Radon-Nikodym $\frac{dQ}{dP}:= \rho$ and we can define a UI martingale via $\rho_t:=E[\rho|\mathscr{F}_t].$ I would like to prove some type of converse result. If I'm given a probability measure $P$ and a UI martingale $\{ \rho_t \},$ how can I define a prob measure Q equivalent to P such that $\rho_t=E[\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathscr{F}_t]$ (or prove that there exists such a Q)?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

First of all, note that we need to assume that $\varrho_t \geq 0$ and $\mathbb{E}(\varrho_t)=1$ for all $t \geq 0$ (because otherwise $\varrho_t$ cannot be a conditional density of a probability measure).

Since $(\varrho_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a uniformly integrable martingale, it follows from the martingale convergence theorem that the limit $\varrho_{\infty} := \lim_{t \to \infty} \varrho_t$ exists in $L^1$ and almost surely. In particular, $\varrho_{\infty} \geq 0$ and $\mathbb{E}(\varrho_{\infty}) = \lim_{t \to \infty} \mathbb{E}(\varrho_t)=1$. This means that

$$\mathbb{Q}(A) := \int_A \varrho_{\infty} \, d\mathbb{P}$$

defines a probability measure. Moreover, $(\varrho_t)_{t \in [0,\infty]}$ is a martingale and so $$\mathbb{E} \left( \frac{d\mathbb{Q}}{d\mathbb{P}} \mid \mathcal{F}_t \right) = \mathbb{E}(\varrho_{\infty} \mid \mathcal{F}_t) = \varrho_t.$$

Remark: The assumption $\mathbb{E}(\varrho_t)=1$ is not very restrictive. Let $(\varrho_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a non-negative, uniformly integrable martingale. If $\mathbb{E}(\varrho_t)=0$, then $\varrho_t=0$ and so $\mathbb{Q}:=0$ satisfies $\mathbb{E}(d\mathbb{Q}/d\mathbb{P} \mid \mathcal{F}_t)=\varrho_t$. On the other hand, if $\mathbb{E}(\varrho_t)=\mathbb{E}(\varrho_0)$ is strictly positive (note that the expectation does not depend on $t$ because of the martingale property), then we can apply the above reasoning to the rescaled process $\frac{1}{\mathbb{E}(\varrho_0)} \varrho_t$.

$\endgroup$
26
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, it's clear now. One more question related with this that it should be straigthforward but I can't see it. Assume we have a square-integrable martingale M. Define $T:= \inf \{t>0 : |M_t|>\frac{1}{2} \}.$ Then I can define prob measures $Q$ and $R$ such that $E[\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathscr{F}_t]=1-N^T$ and $E[\frac{dR}{dP}|\mathscr{F}_t]=1+N^T.$ Why is $P= \frac{1}{2}Q + \frac{1}{2}R$? $\endgroup$
    – UBM
    Commented Dec 13, 2019 at 9:40
  • $\begingroup$ It should be $1-M^T_t$ and $1+M^T_t.$ $\endgroup$
    – UBM
    Commented Dec 13, 2019 at 9:54
  • $\begingroup$ shouldn't it be $1-M_t^T$ and $1+M_t^T$? If not, what is N? $\endgroup$
    – Gono
    Commented Dec 13, 2019 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Gono: yes yes, I was editing it... Do you know the answer? $\endgroup$
    – UBM
    Commented Dec 13, 2019 at 9:57
  • $\begingroup$ First of all you need some additional assumptions, e.g. it has to hold $1-M_t^T \ge 0$ and $1+M_t^T \ge 0$ for all $t$. Then it follows for all $t\ge 0$ that $$E[\frac{1}{2}\frac{dQ}{dP} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{dR}{dP}|\mathcal{F}_t] = \frac{1}{2}(1 - M_t^T + 1 + M_t^T) = 1$$ so we get $$P = \frac{1}{2}Q + \frac{1}{2}R$$ on $$\mathcal{F}_\infty = \sigma\left(\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \mathcal{F}_n\right)$$ $\endgroup$
    – Gono
    Commented Dec 13, 2019 at 10:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .