5
$\begingroup$

A ring $\langle R,+, \cdot\rangle $ is a set $R$ with two binary operations such that:

  1. $\langle R,+\rangle $ is an abelian group.

  2. Multiplication is associative.

  3. Left and right distributive laws hold.

Can someone give me an example where the left distributive law holds but the right one doesn't?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not related to the problem at hand, but: Your definition doesn't require a multiplicative identity? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Mar 30 '13 at 4:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ThomasAndrews Some authors do this. My first algebra book did not require identities. $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Mar 30 '13 at 4:32
  • $\begingroup$ yes, one can always embed a ring without unit into one that does have one. $\endgroup$ – rotten Mar 30 '13 at 4:39
  • $\begingroup$ @rotten The main issue comes with defining ring homomorphisms (most authors require they send $1$ to $1$, for pretty good reasons). $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Mar 30 '13 at 4:44
6
$\begingroup$

Consider the set of affine maps from $\mathbb R$ to $\mathbb R$ under addition and composition. We have right-distributivity as for affine maps $ax+b,cx+d,ex+f$ we get $$a(cx+d)+b+e(cx+d)+f=(a+e)(cx+d)+(b+f)$$ but not left-distributivity as $$a(cx+d+ex+f)+b\neq a(cx+d)+b+a(ex+f)+b$$ when $b\neq 0$. We can make it left-distributive but not right-distributive by simply reversing the order of composition.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @ThomasAndrews Thanks, good point. $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Mar 30 '13 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ Certainly a cleaner example then mine, and it fits a pattern - function composition is a problem for distributive laws on one side :) $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Mar 30 '13 at 4:50
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexBecker why do you have two $b$'s on the RHS of the last equation? $\endgroup$ – ahorn Oct 6 '15 at 12:14
5
$\begingroup$

Consider the set of polynomials with integer coefficients, with addition defined as usual, but multiplication defined as composition:

$$(f\times g)(x) = f(g(x))$$

Then $(f+g)\times h = f\times h + g\times h$, but $h\times (f+g)\neq h\times f + h\times g$ in general.

For example, if $f(x)=x$ and $h(x)=x^2$ then $((f+f)\times h)(x) = 2x^2 = (f\times h)(x) + f\times h(x)$. On the other hand, $h\times(f+f)(x) = 4x^2\neq 2x^2=h\times f(x) + h\times f(x)$.

i'm not sure if this is left- or right-distributive, but if $(R,+,\times)$ is right-distributive, you can create a left-distributive ring $(R,+,\times_{opp})$ with $a\times_{opp} b = b\times a$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.