Let $V$ be a real vector space and let $T$ be one-to-one linear transformation with $T: V → {\Bbb R^n}$. Show that for u, v in $V$,
$$\langle u, v \rangle = T(u)^T \hspace{1mm} T(v)$$
defines an inner product on V

I am not sure how the inner product relates to linear transformation. Do we need to use the definition of inner product? $$\langle u, v \rangle = u^T v$$


Definition (Lang): Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. A scalar product [a.k.a. an inner product] on $V$ is a rule which to any pair of elements $v,w\in V$ associates a scalar, denoted by $\langle v , w \rangle$, or also $v \cdot w$, satisfying the following properties:

$\qquad$ SP $1$. $\space$ We have $\langle v , w \rangle$ = $\langle w , v \rangle$ for all $v,w\in V$.

$\qquad$ SP $2$. $\space$ If $u, v, w$ are elements of $V$, then $$\langle u , v + w \rangle = \langle v , w \rangle + \langle v , w \rangle.$$

$\qquad$ SP $3$. $\space$ If $x \in K$, then $$\langle xu, v\rangle = x \langle u , v \rangle \qquad and \qquad \langle u, xv\rangle = x \langle u , v \rangle$$

As a general rule, when wanting to see if some $X$ is a $Y$ on some structure $Z$, you will want to go back to the original definition of $Y$ and check to see if your hypothesis satisfies all of the necessary conditions.

Lastly, the inner/scalar product is related to linear transformations due to SP $2$ and SP $3$ (which are the definition of a linear transformation).

As an exercise for when you finish your problem, prove the following (credit due to Lang, 1966):

$1. \quad$ Let $V$ be the space of continuous real-valued functions on the interval $[0,1]$ (i.e., $V = \mathbb{C}[0,1]$). If $f, g \in V$, show that $$\langle f, g \rangle = \int_{0}^{1}f(t)g(t) \space dt$$ is an inner product.

Hope this helps you figure this out!


We have to verify that the function $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ does define an inner product on $V$. Since $V$ is a real vector space, an inner product on $V$ is a function $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ such that $\forall u, v, w \in V$ and $\forall a, b \in \mathbb{R}$, \begin{align} & \langle u, v\rangle = \langle v, u \rangle, \\ & \langle au + bw, v \rangle = a \langle u, v \rangle + b \langle w, v \rangle, \\ & \langle u, u \rangle \geq 0 \quad\text{and}\quad \langle u, u \rangle = 0 \iff u = 0. \end{align}

To verify the first condition, we see that for all $u, v \in V$, $$ \langle u, v \rangle = (Tu)^\top Tv = \sum_{j=1}^n (Tu)_j (Tv)_j = (Tv)^\top Tu = \langle v, u \rangle, $$ where $(Tu)_j$ is the $j$-th component of the vector $Tu$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

The second condition is quite straightforward from the linearity of $T$.

The third condition can be verified since $T$ is one-to-one. First, we have for all $u \in V$ that $$ \langle u, u \rangle = (Tu)^\top Tu = \sum_{j=1}^n (Tu)_j (Tu)_j = \sum_{j=1}^d (Tu)_j^2 \geq 0. $$ For $\langle u, u \rangle = 0$, we should have that $(Tu)_j = 0$ for all $j$, so that $Tu = 0$. But since $T$ is one-to-one, we know that $Tu = 0$ if and only if $u=0$. Hence we find that $\langle u, u\rangle = 0$ if and only if $u = 0$, as it should be for $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ to be an inner product on $V$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.