2
$\begingroup$

I recently learned about Gaussian random vectors and am not so sure about my answer to this question.

Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be Gaussian random variables. Does this imply that $(X_1, X_2)$ is a Gaussian random vector?

For your reference, here's my definition of Gaussian:

A random vector $X = (X_1, X_2, \ldots X_n)$ on $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ is called Gaussian if there is a vector $\xi = (\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_n)$ of independent Gaussian random variables with parameters $(0,1 )$ which may be defined on a different probability space $(\tilde{\Omega}, \tilde{\mathcal{F}}, \tilde{P})$, an $n\times n$ matrix $A$, and a vector $a = (a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ such that the vectors $X$ and $A\xi + a$ have the same distribution.

This definition is really confusing to me. I guess it doesn't make so much sense intuitively.

So to show that $(X_1, X_2)$ is Gaussian, I need another vector of Gaussian parameters such that the condition above holds. I think that the answer is yes, $(X_1, X_2)$ is a Gaussian random vector, but I haven't been able to construct these quantities in the general case. I would really appreciate any help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are $X_1$ and $X_2$ independent? $\endgroup$ – user247327 Dec 1 '19 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ No, they do not have to be independent. @user247327 $\endgroup$ – hom Dec 1 '19 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure what is meant by parameter $(0,1)$. And $X_1$, $X_2$ need not be independent for $(X_1, X_2)$ to be a Gaussian random vector (or a multivariate Gaussian normal distribution). In this case we would have mean vector $\mathsf \mu$ the means of $X_1$ and $X_2$ and covariance matrix $\mathsf \Sigma$ the variances of $X_1$ and $X_2$ on the diagonal and the covariance of $(X_1,X_2)$ on the antidiagonal. $\endgroup$ – Math1000 Dec 1 '19 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Math1000 I supose "parameter $(0,1)$" means that the random variables have mean zero and variance 1. $\endgroup$ – saz Dec 1 '19 at 19:07
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @hom Take a look at this question $\endgroup$ – saz Dec 1 '19 at 19:10
5
$\begingroup$

No. For example, suppose $X_1\sim\operatorname N(0,1)$ and $$ X_2 = \begin{cases} \phantom{-}X_1 & \text{each with probability }1/2 \\ -X_1 & \text{independently of } X_1. \end{cases} $$ Then each of $X_1,X_2$ is normally distributed, but $(X_1,X_2)$ is not jointly normally distributed. To see that this pair is not jointly normal, consider that $\Pr(X_1+X_2=0) = 1/2.$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think I am confused by your definition of $X_{2}$. So $X_{2}$ equals $X_{1}$ and $-X_{1}$ each with probability $1/2$? What do you mean by $X_{2} = -X_{1}$ independently of $X_{1}$? $\endgroup$ – hom Dec 2 '19 at 2:01
  • $\begingroup$ @hom : The plus or minus sign to be put in front of $X_1$ is chosen randomly, and that choice is probabilistically independent of the value of $X_1.$ In effect, you toss a coin to decide whether $X_2$ will be equal to $X_1$ or to $-X_1. \qquad $ $\endgroup$ – Michael Hardy Dec 2 '19 at 2:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks. What do you mean by "Consider that $P(X_1 + X_2) = 1/2$? Did you mean $P(X_1 + X_2 = 1/2)$? $\endgroup$ – hom Dec 2 '19 at 2:11
  • $\begingroup$ @hom : Sorry --- I meant $\Pr(X_1+X_2=0) = 1/2. \qquad$ $\endgroup$ – Michael Hardy Dec 2 '19 at 20:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. That's what I thought but just wanted to be sure. @Michael Hardy $\endgroup$ – hom Dec 3 '19 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.