If $X$ is a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and $C\in\mathbb{R}^+$ is an upper bound for the Banach-Mazur distance $d(E,\ell_2^n)$ for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and all $n$-dimensional $E\leq X$, why must $X$ be isomorphic to $\ell_2$?

I've been thinking along the following lines: let $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ be a countable, dense, linearly independent set in $X$ and let $E_n=\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle$ for all $n$. Now for each $n$ there's a linear isomorphism $T_n:E_n\rightarrow\ell_2^n$ such that $\|T_n\|\|T_n^{-1}\|\leq C$. If we can somehow put together these $T_n$ to form a linear isomorphism $T:\cup_nE_n\rightarrow\cup_n\ell_2^n$ = {finite-length sequences in $\ell^2$}, then this extends by continuity to a linear isomorphism $\bar{T}:X\rightarrow\ell_2$.

But how do we get $T$ from the $T_n$? Each $T_n$ is only defined on finitely many of the $x_i$. Maybe some sort of infinite series? Or can we choose each $T_n$ so as to agree with $T_{n-1}$, and still keep the $\|T_n\|\|T_n^{-1}\|\leq C$ property?

Many thanks for any help with this!

  • $\begingroup$ This follows immediately from type/cotype considerations. From the hypotheses is immediate that $X$ must have type 2 and cotype 2, and Kwapien's Theorem implies $X$ must be isomorphic to a Hilbert space. But I am sure there must be a much more elementary explanation, whihc I cannot see right now. $\endgroup$ – Theo Mar 29 '13 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Theo. Thanks. Yes, I think there is a much more elementary way of showing this. The question is from a set sheet at 3rd-year undergraduate level. $\endgroup$ – Harry Macpherson Apr 1 '13 at 14:37

Since $X$ is separable then there exist linearly independent set $\{x_k:k\in\mathbb{N}\}$ such that $X=\mathrm{cl}_X\left(\mathrm{span}\{x_k:k\in\mathbb{N}\}\right)$. Denote $E_n=\mathrm{span}\{x_k:k\in\{1,\ldots,n\}\}$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$, then $$ X=\mathrm{cl}_X(E_\infty)\quad\text{where}\quad E_\infty=\bigcup\limits_{n\in\mathbb{N}} E_n $$ Fix $n\in\mathbb{N}$, then by assumption there exsit $T_n:E_n\to\ell_2^n$ such that $\Vert T_n\Vert\Vert T_n^{-1}\Vert\leq C$. After suitable rescaling of $T_n$ we can assume that $\Vert T_n\Vert\leq 1$ and $\Vert T_n^{-1}\Vert< C$. Consider fucntion $$ \langle\cdot, \cdot\rangle_{E_n}: E_n\times E_n\to\mathbb{R}:(x,y)\mapsto \langle T_n(x),T_n(y)\rangle_{\ell_2^n} $$ Since $T_n$ is an isomorphism this map is inner product, and what is more $$ C^{-2}\Vert x\Vert^2\leq \langle x, x\rangle_{E_n}\leq\Vert x\Vert^2 \tag{1} $$ As the strange consequence for a fixed $x\in E_\infty$ the sequence $\{\langle x, x\rangle_{E_n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is a subset of Hausdorff compact $[0, \Vert x\Vert^2]\subset\mathbb{R}$.

On a directed set $(\mathbb{N},\leq)$ with standard ordering consider respective section filter $\mathcal{F}$ and ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ containing $\mathcal{F}$. Define the map $$ \Vert\cdot\Vert_{E_\infty} :E_\infty\to\mathbb{R}: x\mapsto\lim\limits_{\mathcal{U}}\langle x, x\rangle_{E_n}^{1/2} $$ It is well defined becasuse limit along ultrafiler for any sequence contained in a Hausdorff compact exists and unique.

One can check that $\Vert\cdot\Vert_{E_\infty}$ is a norm satisfying parallelogram law. By Jordan von Neumann theorem we have well defined inner product $$ \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{E_\infty}:E_\infty\times E_\infty\to\mathbb{C}:(x,y)\mapsto\sum\limits_{k=1}^4\frac{i^k}{4}\Vert x+i^ky\Vert_{E_\infty} $$ Since $X=\mathrm{cl}_X(E_\infty)$, there is continuous extension $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_X$ of $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{E_\infty}$ to the inner product on the whole $X$. From $(1)$ it follows that norm $\Vert\cdot\Vert_X$ induced by $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_X$ is equivalent to the original norm of $X$. Hence identity map $$ 1_X:(X,\Vert\cdot\Vert)\to(X,\Vert\cdot\Vert_X):x\mapsto x $$ gives the desired isomorphism.

In the comments below Martin suggested a diagonal's method to avoid usage ultrafilters, but applicable only for separable Banach spaces. This approach can be easily generalized to arbitrary Banach spaces.

  • $\begingroup$ Very nice solution. A small typo: the definition of the norm should be $\lVert x \rVert_{E_{\infty}}^{\mathbf 2} = \lim_{\mathcal{U}} \langle x,x\rangle_{E_n}$. As an (essentially equivalent) alternative to a limit along an ultrafilter you could use a Banach limit. $\endgroup$ – Martin Apr 7 '13 at 19:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin, thank you! How do you think can we avoid usage of such non-constructive things like Banach limit or limit along ultrafilter? $\endgroup$ – Norbert Apr 7 '13 at 19:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't know whether a completely constructive solution is possible. One thing that could work would be to enumerate a dense rational subspace $(x_n)$ in $E_{\infty}$ and extract a diagonal subsequence of $\langle x_i, x_i\rangle_{E_k}$ as in Arzelà-Ascoli: first make sure that $\langle x_1, x_1 \rangle_{k_n}$ converges as $n \to \infty$. Then take a subsequence $k_n^{(2)}$ of the $k_n$ such that $\langle x_2,x_2 \rangle_{k_n^{(2)}}$ converges, etc. Then set $j_n = k_n^{(n)}$ and $\langle x_i,x_i\rangle_{j_n}$ should converge to $\lVert x_i\rVert_{E_{\infty}}^2$ and define a norm. $\endgroup$ – Martin Apr 7 '13 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Norbert 1. I think you have a typo for the norm of $T_{n}^{-1}$, should be smaller than $C$.2. You don't need closure when you define $E_n$, since they are finite dimensional. $\endgroup$ – Theo Apr 7 '13 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Theo 1. fixed 2. closure is necessary. For example $\ell_2$ is the closure of $\mathrm{cl}_{\ell_2}\bigcup\limits_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\ell_2^n$ $\endgroup$ – Norbert Apr 7 '13 at 19:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.