I'm going through "A First Course in Abstract Algebra," by Fraleigh, and I just started going through the chapters on actions on sets. I came across an exercise that asked about two groups related by a homomorphism and the implications of actions on a set:

Let $\phi:G\rightarrow H$ be a group homomorphism, and let $H$ on act a set $X$. What does this tell us about whether or not $G$ acts on $X$?

I think that it does imply that $G$ acts on $X$ (it seems rather intuitive), and I've attempted to prove it below:

If a set $H$ acts on a set $X$, then we have that:

$(i)$ $\forall x\in X$, $e_Hx=x$

$(ii)$ $(h_1h_2)(x)=h_1(h_2x)$, $\forall x\in X$, $h_1,h_2\in H$

To show $(i)$, we note that $e_H=\phi(e_G)$, which implies that:


for all $x\in X$.

To show $(ii)$, we note that by the fact that $\phi$ is a homomorphism:


for $g_1,g_2\in G$. We also have that $\phi(g_1)=h_1$, and $\phi(g_2)=h_2$. So:


by substitution into our previous statement. But the RHS is just:




Does this suffice/is there anything that can be made clearer/more concise? It seems like a fairly straightforward exercise, but the way it was phrased makes me a tad skeptical that it truly is that simple. Any advice would be sincerely appreciated. Cheers.

  • $\begingroup$ By the way, your equations $e_Hx=x$ and $\phi(e_G)x=x$ look suspicious. It seems that your intention was to write down the definition of group actions, in which case you should have written $e_H x \in X$ and $\phi(e_G)x \in X$. $\endgroup$ – Lee Mosher Nov 24 '19 at 17:43

Your intuition is spot on, and the proof is okay (although I would write all the details to be sure of what's going on).

To be explicit, the action $G \circlearrowright X$ is defined as

$$ g \cdot x := \phi(x) \cdot x, \tag{1} $$

where the second dot means the product in the $H$-action.

As for shorter proofs, if you have seen that actions $H \circlearrowright X$ are in correspondence with group homomorphisms $H \xrightarrow{\alpha} S(X)$ from $H$ to the group of bijections of $X$, then this reasoning reduces to noting that given a morphism $\phi : G \to H$ the composition

$$ G \xrightarrow{\phi} H \xrightarrow{\alpha} S(X) $$

is a group morphism, defining thus an action on $X$.

If you unwind the proof of this correspondence, you will obtain $(1)$ once again.

  • $\begingroup$ Great, thank you for your response! $\endgroup$ – scoopfaze Nov 24 '19 at 6:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.