I have read through answers on this site and they all seem to rely on using the one-point compactification to prove that locally compact Hausdorff spaces are in fact completely regular. I would like to instead prove it more directly from the definition, using this lemma:

Let $X$ be a Hausdorff space. Then $X$ is locally compact iff for any given $x\in X$ and a neighborhood $U$ of $x$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $x$ such that $\overline V$ is compact and $\overline V\subset U$.

Now, we must show that given $x\in X$ and $A$ closed in $X$ with $x\notin A$, that there exist disjoint neighborhoods $U$ and $V$ that contain $x$ and $A$, respectively.

I am not sure how to proceed. I know that compact sets in a Hausdorff space are closed, and that seems important in the proof, but I don't know how to use that fact. Any hints would be appreciated.

  • $\begingroup$ Have you taken a look at this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1325286/318467 ? $\endgroup$ Nov 20, 2019 at 0:17
  • $\begingroup$ @CaptainLama I don't really follow that answer. It talks about "compact neighborhoods" and "closed neighborhoods." To me, a "neighborhood" is an open set. It also doesn't seem to show the desired result at all. $\endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Nov 20, 2019 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ A neighborhood of $x$ is a set $V$ such that there is an open subset $U\subset V$ with $x\in U$. If you really have trouble understanding the answer I linked I can try to reformulate it if you want. $\endgroup$ Nov 20, 2019 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is the more general definition of neighborhood. I am following Munkres' convention of using "neighborhood" as "open neighborhood," i.e. "$U$ is an open set containing $x$" is equivalent to "$U$ is a neighborhood of $x$". $\endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Nov 20, 2019 at 0:29

1 Answer 1


I'm just reformulating the answer I linked to.

Take $W$ an open neighborhood of $x$ such that $K=\overline{W}$ is compact (which exists according to your lemma). Define $B=K\cap A$, a closed subset of $K$. Now we can use the fact that compact spaces are regular: in $K$, we can find disjoint open subsets $U'$ and $V'$ with $x\in U'$ and $B\subset V'$.

Then we can take $U=U'\cap W$ and $V=V'\cup (X\setminus K)$: we have $x\in U$, $A\subset V$ and $U\cap V=\emptyset$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. Just one question - I don't see where you used the Hausdorff property. Is it that compact Hausdorff spaces are regular, not just compact spaces? $\endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Nov 20, 2019 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ Ah sorry yes, I got tricked by habit of using the French terminology. By compact I mean Hausdorff compact. $\endgroup$ Nov 20, 2019 at 3:33
  • $\begingroup$ It makes sense now. Thanks again! $\endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Nov 20, 2019 at 3:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.