Lie Derivative is defined through its action on vector fields, as:


This is linear in its arguments due to the linearity of Lie Bracket.

While, for functions:


Ok, now I want to develop the first expression in local coordinates, meaning that:

$$\require{cancel}\begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{X^\alpha\partial_\alpha}(Y^\beta\partial_\beta)&\overset{\begin{align}line&arity\\ &\uparrow \end{align}}{=}X^\alpha\mathcal{L}_{\partial_\alpha}(Y^\beta\partial_\beta)\overset{\begin{align}Leibn&iz\ rule \\ &\uparrow \end{align}}{=}X^\alpha\left[\mathcal{L}_{\partial_\alpha}(Y^\beta)\partial_\beta+Y^\beta\mathcal{L}_{\partial_\alpha}\partial_\beta \right]\\ &= X^\alpha\left[\partial_\alpha(Y^\beta)\partial_\beta+Y^\beta\mathcal{L}_{\partial_\alpha}\partial_\beta \right] = X^\alpha\left[\partial_\alpha(Y^\beta)\partial_\beta+Y^\beta\cancelto{0}{ \left[\partial_\alpha, \partial_\beta \right]} \right]\\ &= X^\alpha\partial_\alpha(Y^\beta)\partial_\beta \end{align}$$

But clearly this is wrong cause it is not equal to the commutator of fields. What am I misunderstanding in this procedure?


PD: For the covariant derivative the preceding way give us the correct expression, why?

$$\begin{align} \nabla_XY&=\nabla_{X^\alpha\partial_\alpha}(Y^\beta\partial_\beta)=X^\alpha\nabla_{\partial_\alpha}(Y^\beta\partial_\beta)\\ &= X^\alpha \left[\left( \partial_\alpha Y^\beta\right)\partial_\beta+Y^\beta\nabla_{\partial_\alpha}\partial_\beta \right]\\ &=X^\alpha\left[\left( \partial_\alpha Y^\beta\right)\partial_\beta+Y^\beta \Gamma_{\beta\alpha}^\sigma\partial_\sigma \right]\\ &=X^\alpha\left[ \partial_\alpha Y^\sigma+Y^\beta \Gamma_{\beta\alpha}^\sigma \right]\partial_\sigma \end{align}$$

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
  • $\begingroup$ The formula you gave for vector fields is not a definition; it's a theorem. The Lie derivative is defined using the flow of the vector field $X$. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Nov 18 '19 at 17:07

The linearity of the Lie bracket is true taking vector fields on $M$ as a $\mathbb{R}$-vector space, not as a $C^\infty(M)$-module. Indeed, there will be some mixed terms:


This is not true for the covariant derivative, which is indedd $C^\infty(M)$-linear in its first parameter.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.